WOODS Servs., INC. v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 839 A.2d 184 (Pa. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
WOODS Servs., INC. v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 839 A.2d 184 (Pa. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Akins, D. (pasuperct, 2019-07-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Akins, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See -8 J -S20035-19 Commonwealth v. Kitchen, 814 A.2d 209, 214 (Pa.Super. 2002), aff'd, 576 Pa. 229 , 839 A.2d 184 (2003) (stating legality of sentence may be subject of inquiry by appellate court sua sponte).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Demark, C.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Kitchen, 814 A.2d 209, 214 (Pa.Super. 2002), aff’d, 576 Pa. 229 , 839 A.2d 184 (2003) (stating legality of sentence may be subject of inquiry by appellate court sua sponte); Commonwealth v. Edrington, 780 A.2d 721 (Pa.Super. 2001) (maintaining legality of sentence claims cannot be waived, and may be reviewed sua sponte, where reviewing court has proper jurisdiction).
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Tustin
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Kitchen, 814 A.2d 209, 214 (Pa.Super.2002), affirmed, 576 Pa. 229 , 839 A.2d 184 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WOODS SERVICES, INC., Appellee
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 23, 2003.
839 A.2d 184
Cappy, C.J., and Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin and Lamb.
Published

Daniel M. Fellin, John A. Kane, Howard C. Ulan, Harrisburg, Leslie Ann Miller, Philadelphia, for Dept. of Public Welfare, appellant.

Thomas Coval, Willow Grove, for Wood Services Inc., appellee.

Before: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and LAMB, JJ.

Prior report: 803 A.2d 260.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.