Navin v. Essex Sav. Bank, 859 A.2d 563 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Navin v. Essex Sav. Bank, 859 A.2d 563 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bicio v. Brewer (connappct, 2005-11-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Bicio v. Brewer
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Navin v. Essex Savings Bank, 82 Conn. App. 255, 258-59 , 843 A.2d 679 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 902 , 859 A.2d 563 (2004). “[A] writ of summons is a statutory prerequisite to the commencement of a civil action. . . . [I\t, is an essential element to the validity of the jurisdiction of the court. . . . [T]he writ of summons need not be technically perfect, and need not conform exactly to the form set out in the Practice Book ....
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JEFFREY W. NAVIN
v.
ESSEX SAVINGS BANK
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 8, 2004.
859 A.2d 563
Kenneth R. Davis, in support of the petition., John S. Bennet, in opposition.
Published

The petition by the plaintiffs Jeffrey W. Navin, John F. Coyne and John T. O’Reilly for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 255 (AC 24250), is denied.