green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
N. R. v. M. P.
Id., 431–32.17 Our 17 Those factors include: ‘‘[E]ach parent’s reasons for seeking or opposing the move, the quality of the relationships between the child and the custodial and noncustodial parents, the impact of the move on the quantity and quality of the child’s future contact with the noncustodial parent, the degree to which the custodial parent’s and child’s life may be enhanced economically, emotionally and educationally by the move, and the feasibility of preserving the relationship between the noncustodial parent and child through suitable visitation arrangements. . . . […
City of New London
v.
Foss and Bourke, Inc.
v.
Foss and Bourke, Inc.
SC 17308.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 10, 2004.
C. George Kanabis, in support of the petition., Edward B. O’ConneU and David P. Condon, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 275 (AC 23707), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s determination that the assembled economic unit doctrine was not applicable to the determination of the value of the property taken by eminent domain?”