green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
City of Wilmington v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company
Super., July 30, 2004) (“A writ of certiorari’s purpose is to correct errors of law, to review proceedings not conducted according to law, and to restrain an excess of jurisdiction”); Shoemaker v, State, 375 A.2d 431, 437 (Del. 1977) (recognizing function of certiorari is to provide a remedy to a party alleging a lower court had acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction or without compliance with the requirements of law). 23 Adzjile v. city Of Wilmington, 875 A.2d 632, at *2 (Dei. 2005). 24 Id (internal citations omitted). 25 ./wdan v. Town OfMizmn, 2012 WL 5494667 , at *3 (Dei. sup…
cited
Cited "see"
Pereira v. Farace - concurrence
See United States Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. United States Timberlands Klamath Falls, LLC, 864 A.2d 930 , 947-48 (Del.Ch.2004), vacated on other grounds, No. 36, 2005, 2005 WL 1353766 , 875 A.2d 632 (Del.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. Vertin
See, e.g., id. at 790 n.57 (explaining that the interests of creditors and stockholders diverge "when a firm is insolvent or near insolvency”); id. at 791 ("By definition, the fact of insolvency places the creditors in the shoes normally occupied by the shareholders — that of residual risk-bearers.”); id. at 792 ("The firm’s insolvency simply makes the creditors the principal constituency injured by any fiduciary breaches that diminish the firm's value and logically gives them standing to pursue these claims to rectify that injury.”). 31 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Teleglobe USA, Inc. v. BCE Inc. (In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.)
See, e.g., U.S. Bank Nat’l Assn. v. U.S. Timberlands Klamath Falls, L.L.C., 864 A.2d 930, 947 (Del.Ch.2004), vacated on other grounds, 875 A.2d 632 (Del.2005) (“In Delaware, insolvency is defined in two ways.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matrix Group Ltd. v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.
Compare U.S. Bank N.A. v. U.S. Timberlands Klamath Falls, L.L.C., 864 A.2d 930, 947-48 (Del.Ch.2004) (using the equitable definition), vacated on other grounds, 875 A.2d 632 (2005), with Geyer, 621 A.2d at 788 (using the balance sheet definition).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca8 2007
Compare U.S. Bank N.A. v. U.S. Timberlands Klamath Falls, L.L.C., 864 A.2d 930, 947-48 (Del.Ch.2004) (using the equitable definition), vacated on other grounds, 875 A.2d 632 (2005), with Geyer, 621 A.2d at 788 (using the balance sheet definition).
EMACHINES, INC.
v.
GHOLL.
v.
GHOLL.
014, 2005.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jun 14, 2005.
Published
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.