State v. Little, 879 A.2d 895 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Little, 879 A.2d 895 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gaskin v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2018-07-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Gaskin v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grant v. Commissioner of Correction , 87 Conn. App. 814 , 817, 867 A.2d 145 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 918 , 879 A.2d 895 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Little v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Little, 88 Conn. App. 708, 710-11 , 870 A.2d 1170 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 916 , 879 A.2d 895 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Leak
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
The court shall state whether the respective maxima and minima shall run concurrently or consecutively with respect to each other, and shall state in conclusion the effective sentence imposed. . . 12 We recognize the principle that, “ [i]n the absence of a timely designation of the defendant’s sentence as concurrent with or consecutive to his prior undischarged term of imprisonment, the common-law rule prevails, and the sentence will be treated as concurrent.” State v. Pina, 185 Conn. 473, 482 , 440 A.2d 962 (1981); see also Grant v. Commissioner of Correction, 87 Conn. App. 814, 818 , 8…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kelly
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
A person who should be confined is defined in § 17a-580 (10) as “an acquittee who has psychiatric *35 disabilities ... to the extent that his discharge . . . would constitute a danger to himself or others . . . .” In State v. March, 265 Conn. 697 , 830 A.2d 212 (2003), our Supreme Court further interpreted the statutory phrase “[d] anger to self or to others” according to § 17a-581-2 (a) (6) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies as meaning “the risk of imminent physical injury to others or self, including the risk of loss or destruction of the property of others.” (Int…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Troy Little
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 12, 2005.
879 A.2d 895
Richard E. Condon, Jr., assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Denise B. Smoker, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Norcott.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn. App. 708 (AC 25590), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.