Kanter v. Epstein, 880 A.2d 1239 (Pa. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Kanter v. Epstein, 880 A.2d 1239 (Pa. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
70 citation events (70 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Woo, R. (pasuperct, 2019-05-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Woo, R.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Woo, 863 A.2d 1234 (Pa. Super. 2004) (unpublished memorandum), appeal denied, 880 A.2d 1239 (Pa. 2005).
discussed Cited "see" Ettorre, M. v. Ettorre, F.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kanter v. Epstein, 866 A.2d 394, 401 (Pa. Super. 2004), appeal denied, 880 A.2d 1239 (Pa. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1092 (2006) (waiving prolix Rule 1925(b) statement where court determined that “outrageous number of issues” was deliberate attempt to circumvent purpose of Rule 1925).
discussed Cited "see" Hill, E. v. Clawson, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kanter v. Epstein, 866 A.2d 394, 401 (Pa. Super. 2004), appeal denied, 880 A.2d 1239 (Pa. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1092 (2006) (waiving prolix Rule 1925(b) statement where court determined that presentation of “outrageous number of issues” was deliberate attempt to circumvent purpose of Rule 1925); see also Jiricko v. Geico Ins.
discussed Cited "see" 1400 Market St. v. Fox Funding LLC
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kanter v. Epstein, 866 A.2d 394, 401 (Pa. Super. 2004), appeal denied, 880 A.2d 1239 (Pa. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1092 (2006) (waiving prolix Rule 1925(b) statement (Footnote Continued Next Page) - 11 - J-A16006-15 149, 150 (Pa. Super. 1982) (“When issues are not properly raised and developed in briefs, and when the briefs are wholly inadequate to present specific issues for review, a court will not consider the merits thereof.”) (citations omitted).
cited Cited "see" Eiser v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
Pa. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kanter v. Epstein, 866 A.2d 394 (Pa.Super.Ct.2004), alloc. denied, 584 Pa. 678 , 880 A.2d 1239 (2005); cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Levanduski (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lineberger v. Wyeth, 894 A.2d 141 , 148 n. 4 (Pa.Super.2006) (citing Kanter v. Epstein, 866 A.2d 394 , 400 n. 6 (Pa.Super.2004), appeal denied, 584 Pa. 678 , 880 A.2d 1239 (2005), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 1048 , 163 L.Ed.2d 858 (2006)).
discussed Cited "see" Lineberger v. Wyeth
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kaczkowski v. Bolubasz, 491 Pa. 561 , 421 A.2d 1027 (1980) (rejecting prior practice of discounting future lost earnings in personal injury awards). [3] We have reorganized Appellant's issues to mirror their presentation in the body of Appellant's brief. [4] "Since the Rules of Appellate Procedure apply to criminal and civil cases alike, the principles enunciated in criminal cases construing those rules are equally applicable in civil cases." Kanter v. Epstein, 866 A.2d 394 , 400 n. 6 (Pa.Super.2004), appeal denied, 584 Pa. 678 , 880 A.2d 1239 (2005).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Young, R. v. Young, K.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Pa.R.A.P. 2101, 2119(a)-(c); Krauss, supra at 584 ; see also Kanter v. Epstein, 866 A.2d 394, 402 (Pa. Super. 2004), appeal denied, 880 A.2d 1239 (Pa. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1092 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Pennington, N.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co., 947 A.2d 206, 210 (Pa. Super. 2008), appeal denied, 958 A.2d 1048 (Pa. 2008) (finding waiver appropriate remedy where appellant filed five-page incoherent statement of errors); see also Kanter v. Epstein, 866 A.2d 394, 401 (Pa. Super. 2004), appeal denied, 880 A.2d 1239 (Pa. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1092 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KANTER
v.
EPSTEIN. IN RE SPENCER GADON & ROSEN, P.C.
130, 131 EAL (2005).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 2, 2005.
880 A.2d 1239
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.