State v. Soldi, 895 A.2d 792 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Soldi, 895 A.2d 792 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
66 citation events (66 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2010-06-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · confidence medium
Id., 851.
cited Cited "see" State v. Andersen
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mulero, 91 Conn. App. 509 , 514 n.3, 881 A.2d 1039 (2005), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 912 , 895 A.2d 792 , cert. denied, 549 U.S. 862 , 127 S. Ct. 149 , 166 L.
examined Cited "see" State v. Sligh (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally State v. Soldi, 92 Conn. App. 849, 857 , 887 A.2d 436 (burden shifting in violation of probation context), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 913 , 895 A.2d 792 (2006); State ex rel.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Smith (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mulero, 91 Conn. App. 509 , 514 n.3, 881 A.2d 1039 (2005), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 912 , 895 A.2d 792 , cert. denied, 549 U.S. 862 , 127 S. Ct. 149 , 166 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. WILLIAM C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mulero, 91 Conn. App. 509 , 514 n.3, 881 A.2d 1039 (2005), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 912 , 895 A.2d 792 , cert. denied, 549 U.S. 862 , 127 S. Ct. 149 , 166 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Pauling
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mulero, 91 Conn. App. 509 , 514 n.3, 881 A.2d 1039 (2005), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 912 , 895 A.2d 792 , cert. denied, 549 U.S. 862 , 127 S. Ct. 149 , 166 L.
examined Cited "see, e.g." Roger B. v. Commissioner of Correction (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
Both this court and our Supreme Court have emphasized that there is no ‘‘per se approach as to what period of time to execute an arrest warrant is reasonable.’’ State v. Crawford, supra, 202 Conn. 451; see also State v. Soldi, 92 Conn. App. 849, 856, 887 A.2d 436 (noting absence of per se approach in context of considering whether five year delay in serving defendant with arrest warrant was reasonable), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 913, 895 A.2d 792 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gonzalez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Morocho , 93 Conn. App. 205 , 215, 888 A.2d 164 (jury reasonably may have inferred, on basis of everyday experience and evidence presented, that by entering victim's bedroom, lying on top of her while attempting to kiss and touch her all over her body, defendant took substantial step in line of conduct that would culminate in sexual intercourse), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 915 , 895 A.2d 792 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Smith (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
The applicable standard of review for the denial of a motion to dismiss, therefore, generally turns on whether the appellant seeks to challenge the legal conclusions of the trial court or its factual determinations." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Pittman , 123 Conn.App. 774 , 775, 3 A.3d 137 , cert. denied, 299 Conn. 914 , 10 A.3d 530 (2010) ; see also State v. Soldi , 92 Conn.App. 849 , 852-53, 887 A.2d 436 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 913 , 895 A.2d 792 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Daniel B.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare State v. Carter, 141 Conn. App. 377, 387 , 61 A.3d 1103 (2013) (focusing on what actor has done and not what remains to be done as applied to facts of case), aff’d, 317 Conn. 845 , 120 A.3d 1229 (2015), State v. Osbourne, supra, 138 Conn. App. 528 (‘‘[t]his standard focuses on what the actor has already done and not what remains to be done’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), State v. Robinson, 127 Conn. App. 1, 9 , 15 A.3d 648 (focusing on what actor has done and not what remains to be done as applied to facts of case), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 942 , 17 A.3d 477 (2011), Sta…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Rosemarie C. SOLDI.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 2, 2006.
895 A.2d 792
Published

Julia K. Conlin, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Glenn W. Falk, special public defender, in opposition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn.App. 849, 887 A.2d 436 (2006), is denied.