Vargas v. Doe, 908 A.2d 546 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Vargas v. Doe, 908 A.2d 546 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Platt v. Tilcon Connecticut, Inc. (connappct, 2020-03-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Platt v. Tilcon Connecticut, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See United Social & Mental Health Services, Inc. v. Rodowicz, 96 Conn. App. 34, 39 , 899 A.2d 85 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 920 , 908 A.2d 546 (2006); see also Welk v. Bidwell, 136 Conn. 603, 608 , 73 A.2d 295 (1950) (‘‘where the parties are in definite dispute as to any of the essential terms of a new tenancy, certainly no lease can be implied from the fact that the tenant holds over’’).
discussed Cited "see" Bank of New York v. Bell (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vargas v. Doe, 96 Conn.App. 399, 407 , 900 A.2d 525 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 923 , 908 A.2d 546 (2006).
cited Cited "see" Turner v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Turner v. Commissioner of Correction, 97 Conn. App. 15 , 902 A.2d 716 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 922 , 908 A.2d 546 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Russell
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vargas v. Doe, 96 Conn. App. 399, 407-408 , 900 A.2d 525 (“[w]e are constrained to read a statute as written . . . and we may not read into clearly expressed legislation provisions which do not find expression in its words” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 923 , 908 A.2d 546 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. (2×)
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, supra, 464 U.S. 510 ; see Doe v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee, supra, 66; see also Vargas v. Doe, 96 Conn. App. 399, 406-407 , 900 A.2d 525 (2006) (reviewing statutory exceptions allowing closed proceedings), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 923 , 908 A.2d 546 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF NEW HAVEN v. DeRoche
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
The mutual understanding must manifest itself by a mutual assent between the parties.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Krondes v. O'Boy, 37 Conn. App. 430, 434 , 656 A.2d 692 (1995); see also United Social & Mental Health Services, Inc. v. Rodowicz, 96 Conn. App. 34, 40 , 899 A.2d 85 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 920 , 908 A.2d 546 (2006); Fortier v. Newington Group, *371 Inc., 30 Conn. App. 505, 510 , 620 A.2d 1321 (“[i]n order for an enforceable contract to exist, the court must find that the parties’ minds had truly met”), cert. denied, 225 Conn. 922 , 625 A.2d 823 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALFREDO VARGAS
v.
JOHN DOE
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 27, 2006.
908 A.2d 546
Max F. Brunswick, in support of the petition., Nathalie Feola-Guerrieri and Daniel Shepro, in opposition.
Published

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is denied.

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.