green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sayles
Thus, we evaluate the claim only under the federal constitution. 19 As a result of our conclusion, we need not address the other ground on which the state relies in support of the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress, namely, the inevitable discovery doctrine. 20 ‘‘A seizure of property occurs when there is some meaningful interfer- ence with an individual’s possessory interests in that property.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jones, 320 Conn. 22 , 64, 128 A.3d 431 (2015); State v. Jackson, 304 Conn. 383, 394 , 40 A.3d 290 (2012). 21 ‘‘To discourage unre…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sayles
Thus, we evaluate the claim only under the federal constitution. 19 As a result of our conclusion, we need not address the other ground on which the state relies in support of the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress, namely, the inevitable discovery doctrine. 20 ‘‘A seizure of property occurs when there is some meaningful interfer- ence with an individual’s possessory interests in that property.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Jones, 320 Conn. 22 , 64, 128 A.3d 431 (2015); State v. Jackson, 304 Conn. 383, 394 , 40 A.3d 290 (2012). 21 ‘‘To discourage unre…
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas v. State
See State v. Thomas, 98 Conn. App. 542 , 909 A.2d 969 (2006), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 910 , 916 A.2d 53 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Timothy MONROE.
v.
Timothy MONROE.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 25, 2007.
Published
Robert E. Byron, special public defender, in support of the petition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn.App. 588, 910 A.2d 229 (2006), is denied.