State v. Robles, 934 A.2d 244 (Conn. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Robles, 934 A.2d 244 (Conn. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
79 citation events (79 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Patel (connappct, 2019-01-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Patel (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. William C. , 103 Conn. App. 508 , 520 n.6, 930 A.2d 753 ("[t]he defendant did not object at trial, however, to the court's instructions, and, therefore, the unpreserved claim of instructional error is not reviewable"), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 928 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007). 18 The judgment is affirmed.
discussed Cited "see" Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. William C., 103 Conn. App. 508, 510 , 930 A.2d 753 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 928 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007).
discussed Cited "see" Anatra v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF MADISON (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Brunswick v. Statewide Grievance Committee, 103 Conn. App. 601, 613 , 931 A.2d 319 , cert, denied, 284 Conn. 929 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007).
discussed Cited "see" WILLIAM C. v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. William C., 103 Conn. App. 508 , 930 A.2d 753 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 928 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007).
cited Cited "see" Taylor v. Pervis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brunswick v. Statewide Grievance Committee, 103 Conn. App. 601, 603-604 , 931 A.2d 319 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 929 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007).
discussed Cited "see" Kraiza v. Planning & Zoning Commission (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brunswick v. Statewide Grievance Committee, 103 Conn. App. 601, 612 , 931 A.2d 319 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 929 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007); Quality Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 55 Conn. App. 533, 540, 738 A.2d 1157 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Council 4, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. State Board of Labor Relations, 111 Conn. App. 666, 672 , 961 A.2d 451 (2008), cert. denied, 290 Conn. 901 , 967 A.2d 112 (2009); see also *589 Brunswick v. Statewide Grievance Committee, 103 Conn. App. 601, 611 , 931 A.2d 319 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 929 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Papic v. Burke, 113 Conn. App. 198, 210-11 , 965 A.2d 633 (2009).
examined Cited "see, e.g." State v. ADEYEMI (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
We, therefore, cannot conclude that the court abused its discretion when it determined that the probative value of the evidence of the theft of clothing, bicycles and a garbage truck as to the defendant's state of mind during his escape outweighed any prejudicial impact on the jury. *217 Also, the limiting instruction, given during the court's charge to the jury, minimized any unduly prejudicial impact. [4] See State v. Anderson, 86 Conn.App. 854, 870 , 864 A.2d 35 (jury presumed to follow court's instructions absent clear evidence to contrary), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (200…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Papic v. Burke
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
“This substantial evidence standard is highly deferential *211 and permits less judicial scrutiny than a clearly erroneous or weight of the evidence standard of review.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Council 4, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. State Board of Labor Relations, 111 Conn. App. 666, 672 , 961 A.2d 451 (2008), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 901 , 967 A.2d 112 (2009); see also Brunswick v. Statewide Grievance Committee, 103 Conn. App. 601, 611 , 931 A.2d 319 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 929 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Angel ROBLES.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 16, 2007.
934 A.2d 244
Published

Joseph A. Jaumann, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn.App. 383, 930 A.2d 27 (2007), is denied.