green
Positive treatment
12.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Matthew W.
See In re Anna Lee M., 104 Conn. App. 121, 128 , 931 A.2d 949 (‘‘for the court to make a determination as to the respondent’s prospects for rehabilitation, the court was required to obtain a historical perspective of the respondent’s child caring and parenting abilities’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Lanphaer
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See id. at 22–23 (letter from Connecticut Appellate Clerk of Court), 30–33 (Connecticut Superior Court decision).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Lillyanne D.
See In re Anna Lee M., 104 Conn. App. 121, 128 , 931 A.2d 949 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007). 16 The record does not indicate what alternative caregiving plan the respon- dent father had proposed. 17 The department also may meet its burden concerning reunification efforts under § 17a-112 (j) (1) based on ‘‘a previous judicial determination that such efforts were not appropriate.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Ryder M., supra, 211 Conn. App. 808 . 18 After Richard was born in June, 2019, the court ordered specific steps that encompassed the same steps …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dawson
See State v. Gordon , 104 Conn. App. 69 , 83-84, 931 A.2d 939 (court reminded jury prior to trial and following final argument that court, not counsel, was sole source of applicable law), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brewer v. Commissioner of Correction
See Jackson v. Com- missioner of Correction, 227 Conn. 124 , 131–32, 629 A.2d 413 (1993). ‘‘This [procedural] rule promotes not only the accuracy and efficiency of judicial decisions, but also the finality of those decisions, by forcing the defendant to litigate all of his claims together, as quickly after trial as the docket will allow, and while the atten- tion of the appellate court is focused on his case.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Lorthe v. Commis- sioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 662, 696 , 931 A.2d 348 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007). ‘‘A…
discussed
Cited "see"
Atkins v. Commissioner of Correction
See Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 662, 703 , 931 A.2d 348 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007). 2 The petitioner uses the word ‘‘victims’’ to describe C, the victim whom he was convicted of sexually assaulting in this case, and C’s stepsister, A, whom the petitioner had allegedly sexually assaulted five years earlier. 3 ‘‘In accordance with our policy of protecting the privacy interests of the victims of sexual abuse and the crime of risk of injury to a child, we decline to identify the victim or others through whom the victim’s identity ma…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hardison v. Commissioner of Correction
See Alexander v. Commissioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 629, 640 , 930 A.2d 58 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 973 A.2d 695 (2007). 10 The petitioner also claims that the habeas court made several clearly erroneous factual findings not supported by the evidence.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bree
See State v. Santiago, 103 Conn. App. 406, 412 , 931 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Albino
See State v. Gordon, 104 Conn. App. 69, 85 , 931 A.2d 939 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. NASHEED
We are aware of case law that holds that “the prosecutor must confine the arguments to the evidence in the record.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Whipper, 258 Conn. 229, 263 , 780 A.2d 53 (2001), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Cruz, 269 Conn. 97, 106 , 848 A.2d 445 (2004); see State v. Santiago, 103 Conn. App. 406, 424 , 931 A.2d 298 (prosecutor may not comment unfairly on evidence in record), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mozell v. Commissioner of Correction
See Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 662 , 668 n.4, 931 A.2d 348 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007). 4 In State v. Golding, supra, 213 Conn. 240 , we stated that “[i]n the absence of any one of these conditions, the [petitioner’s] claim will fail.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gould
See State v. Gordon, 104 Conn. App. 69, 75 , 931 A.2d 939 (“only the court has the authority to instruct the jury on the law”), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McCarthy
See State v. Santiago, 103 Conn. App. 406 , 409 n.2, 931 A.2d 298 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007). 2 For example, Ware testified that when he heard gunshots, he ran out of Melissa’s Market and that the victim still was on his feet, coming toward him, and that the victim then fell down.
discussed
Cited "see"
Marandino v. Prometheus Pharmacy
(2×)
See Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 662, 699 , 931 A.2d 348 (“[t]his court does not review claims raised for the first time on appeal”), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Little v. Commissioner of Correction
On April 29, 2016, the petitioner's appellate counsel filed an Anders brief and a motion for permission to withdraw as counsel, representing that "[u]pon thorough review and examination of the transcripts, information and record in this matter, the undersigned has determined that an appeal in this matter would be frivolous." See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 , 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) ; see, e.g., Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction , 103 Conn.App. 662 , 674, 931 A.2d 348 (discussing filing of briefs by appointed counsel, pursuant to Anders , to inform court that ha…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tilus v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See, e.g., Alexander v. Commissioner of Correction , 103 Conn.App. 629 , 638, 930 A.2d 58 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007) ; State v. McCulloch , 24 Conn.App. 146 , 148, 585 A.2d 1271 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaddah v. Commissioner of Correction
If the officer fails to make immediate return of the writ, with his actions thereon, he shall pay fifty dollars to the person so held in custody...." 16 See footnote 9 of this opinion for the full text of § 52-470. 17 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 , 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) ; see, e.g., Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction , 103 Conn.App. 662 , 676, 931 A.2d 348 (discussing filing of briefs by appointed counsel, pursuant to Anders , to inform court that habeas petition or appeal is "wholly frivolous"), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007) ; see also Pra…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction
At the time of the court’s judgment dismissing the petitioner’s consolidated petition, Practice Book (2009) § 23-42 (a) provided in relevant part: “If the judicial *411 authority finds that the case is wholly without merit, it shall allow counsel to withdraw and shall consider whether the petition shall be dismissed or allowed to proceed, with the petitioner pro se. . . .” This court has held that this subsection “provides an explicit exception to the general rule requiring an evidentiary hearing before a habeas petition may be dismissed.” Riddick v. Commissioner of Correction, 11…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Vasquez
Compare State v. Santiago, 103 Conn. App. 406, 417 , 931 A.2d 298 (trial court’s failure to give accomplice instruction harmless under plain error analysis), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 937 , 937 A.2d 695 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riddick v. Commissioner of Correction
Id., 381-82; see also Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 662, 693 , 931 A.2d 348 (habeas court sua sponte dismissed habeas petition pursuant to Practice Book § 23-42), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007); cf. Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction, 99 Conn. App. 310, 312-13 , 913 A.2d 477 (habeas court permitted petitioner to proceed pro se rather than dismiss petition), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 924 , 918 A.2d 275 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carl Alexander
v.
Commissioner of Correction
v.
Commissioner of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 26, 2007.
Sarah F. Summons, special public defender, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisor assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Schaller.
Published
The petitioner Carl Alexander’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 629 (AC 26985), is denied.
SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.