green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Blake, 106 Conn. App. 345, 352 , 942 A.2d 496 (‘‘[t]he linchpin of the determination of the defendant’s access to the records is whether they sufficiently disclose material especially probative of the [witness’] ability to comprehend, know and correctly relate the truth . . . so as to justify breach of their confidenti- ality and disclosing them to the defendant in order to protect his right of confrontation’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 922 , 951 A.2d 573 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Estrella J.C.
See State v. Bazemore , 107 Conn.App. 441 , 461, 945 A.2d 987 (court properly relied on evidence presented at trial in imposing sentence), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 923 , 951 A.2d 573 (2008). 12 Accordingly, we reject the defendant's first argument and conclude that the court did not err by imposing, in each of the two relevant convictions, the mandatory minimum five year sentence pursuant to the 2007 amendment to § 53-21 (a) (2).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Stanley
See State v. Bazemore, 107 Conn. App. 441, 455 , 945 A.2d 987 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 923 , 951 A.2d 573 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jessie L. C.
See State v. Bazemore, 107 Conn. App. 441, 454-55 , 945 A.2d 987 (defendant argued that long form information was duplicitous where it set forth two counts of robbery without identifying robbery victims and defendant allegedly robbed various individuals), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 923 , 951 A.2d 573 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Elson
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Bazemore, 107 Conn. App. 441, 459-60 , 945 A.2d 987 (court rejects under Golding's third prong unpreserved claim that trial court improperly considered several uncharged crimes at sentencing), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 923 , 951 A.2d 573 (2008); State v. Dudley, 68 Conn. App. 405, 425-26 , 791 A.2d 661 (court rejects under Golding unpreserved claim that trial court considered improper factors at sentencing), cert, denied, 260 Conn. 916 , 797 A.2d 515 (2002); State v. Middlebrook, 51 Conn. App. 711, 732-33 , 725 A.2d351 (court declines to review unpreserved claim that trial co…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Kimberly ALBRIGHT-LAZZARI. State of Connecticut v. Anthony Lazzari.
v.
Kimberly ALBRIGHT-LAZZARI. State of Connecticut v. Anthony Lazzari.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 17, 2008.
Published
Kimberly Albright-Lazzari, pro se, and Anthony Lazzari, pro se, in support of the petition.
Susan C. Marks, supervisory assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 29497) is denied.