State v. Re, 964 A.2d 543 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Re, 964 A.2d 543 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (36 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Hayward (connappct, 2016-12-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hayward
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Torres , 111 Conn.App. 575 , 587-88, 960 A.2d 573 (2008), cert. denied, 290 Conn. 907 , 964 A.2d 543 (2009) (voluntarily offering to repay forged check is not sufficient for jury reasonably to find that defendant acted in good faith).
discussed Cited "see" Forbes v. Lynch
2d Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Torres, 111 Conn.App. 575, 584 , 960 A.2d 573 (2008), cert. denied, 290 Conn. 907 , 964 A.2d 543 (2009) (noting the “lack of consent” requirement for third degree larceny in a case where defendant deposited forged cashier checks).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Beaulieu (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Re, 111 Conn. App. 466, 469 , 959 A.2d 1044 (2008), cert. denied, 290 Conn. 908 , 964 A.2d 543 (2009).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Rozbicki
Conn. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
Rule 3.1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct provides in relevant part: "A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law...." The commentary to this rule clarifies what is considered to be a frivolous action, providing that an "action is frivolous ... if the lawyer is unable either to make a good faith argument on the merits of the action taken or to support the action taken by a g…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Krijger
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Torres, 111 Conn. App. 575, 587 , 960 A.2d 573 (2008) (“we . . . evaluate the evidence in light of the jury’s guilty verdict [and therefore] must evaluate the evidence consistent with a finding of the defendant’s guilt”), cert. denied, 290 Conn. 907 , 964 A.2d 543 (2009).
STATE of Connecticut
v.
John Merritt RE.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 14, 2009.
964 A.2d 543
Published

Lisa J. Steele, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn.App. 466, 959 A.2d 1044 (2008), is denied.