green
Positive treatment
15.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Thompson , [ 118 Conn. App. 140 , 162, 983 A.2d 20 (2009) ] (within fifteen minutes defendant entered victim's car, pushed her behind a building and sexually assaulted her) [cert. denied, 294 Conn. 932 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010) ]; State v. Flores , [supra, 301 Conn. at 89 , 17 A.3d 1025 ] (defendant's robbery of victim in her bedroom lasted between five and twenty minutes); State v. Gary , [ 120 Conn. App. 592 , 611, 992 A.2d 1178 ] (defendant convicted of multiple sexual assaults and an attempted sexual assault that were in close temporal proximity to the defendant's restraint of th…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Thompson , [ 118 Conn. App. 140 , 162, 983 A.2d 20 (2009) ] (within fifteen minutes defendant entered victim's car, pushed her behind a building and sexually assaulted her) [cert. denied, 294 Conn. 932 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010) ]; State v. Flores , [supra, 301 Conn. at 89 , 17 A.3d 1025 ] (defendant's robbery of victim in her bedroom lasted between five and twenty minutes); State v. Gary , [ 120 Conn. App. 592 , 611, 992 A.2d 1178 ] (defendant convicted of multiple sexual assaults and an attempted sexual assault that were in close temporal proximity to the defendant's restraint of *1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Shirley P. v. Norman P.
(2×)
See *97 State v. Thompson , 118 Conn. App. 140 , 154, 983 A.2d 20 (2009) (decision of **660 this court changing interpretation of kidnapping statute applied to criminal case in which appeal was filed before decision changing law was released), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 932 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Thompson, [ 118 Conn. App. 140, 162 , 983 A.2d 20 (2009)] (within fifteen minutes defendant entered victim’s car, pushed her behind a building and sexually assaulted her) [cert. denied, 294 Conn. 932 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010)]; State v. Flores, [supra, 301 Conn. 89 ] (defendant’s robbery of victim in her bedroom lasted between five and twenty minutes); State v. Gary, [ 120 Conn. App. 592, 611 , 992 A.2d 1178 ] (defendant convicted of multiple sexual assaults and an attempted sexual assault that were in close temporal proximity to the defendant’s restraint of the victim; thus co…
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Thompson , [ 118 Conn.App. 140 , 162, 983 A.2d 20 (2009) ] (within fifteen minutes defendant entered victim's car, pushed her behind a building and sexually assaulted her) [cert. denied, 294 Conn. 932 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010) ]; State v. Flores , [ 301 Conn. 77 , 89, 17 A.3d 1025 (2011) ] (defendant's robbery of victim in her bedroom lasted between five and twenty minutes); State v. Gary , [ 120 Conn.App. 592 , 611, 992 A.2d 1178 ] (defendant convicted of multiple sexual assaults and an attempted sexual assault that were in close temporal proximity to the defendant's restraint of th…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hinds v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Thompson, [ 118 Conn. App. 140, 162 , 983 A.2d 20 (2009)] (within fifteen minutes defendant entered victim’s car, pushed her behind a building and sexually assaulted her) [cert. denied, 294 Conn. 932 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010)]; State v. Flores, [ 301 Conn. 77, 89 , 17 A.3d 1025 (2011)] (defendant’s robbery of victim in her bedroom lasted between five and twenty minutes); State v. Gary, [ 120 Conn. App. 592, 611 , 992 A.2d 1178 ] (defendant convicted of multiple sexual assaults and an attempted sexual assault that were ‘in close temporal proximity to the defendant’s restraint …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Antonaras
(2×)
See State v. Thompson, 118 Conn. App. 140 , 154-55 and 154 n.7, 983 A.2d 20 (2009), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 932 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Thompson, 118 Conn. App. 140, 150 , 983 A.2d 20 (2009) (considering individual facts of case to determine whether conflict of interest existed pursuant to Phillips), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 932 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Karlen v. Saleeb
For the purpose of this rule, significant court- room proceedings other than a trial in the underlying action at which a court is empowered to render judgment to enforce a settlement agreement presented to it by the parties to that action have been held to include both pretrial conferences in the action; see, e.g., McCook v. Whitebirch Construction, LLC, 117 Conn. App. 320, 323, 330 , 978 A.2d 1150 (2009) (settlement agreement was properly enforced where, “[a]t the conclusion of [a second pretrial] conference, counsel for [the parties] reported to the court . . . that a global settlement agr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matos v. Ortiz
See, e.g., McCook v. Whitebirch Construction, LLC, 117 Conn.App. 320 , 329, 978 A.2d 1150 (2009) ( "the record supports the court's [factual] finding that the parties reached a mutual understanding with respect to the settlement agreement"), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 932 , 987 A.2d 1029 (2010) ; DAP Financial Management Co. v. Mor-Fam Electric, Inc., 59 Conn.App. 92 , 98, 755 A.2d 925 (2000) ("What the plaintiff really seeks is to have us believe his witnesses rather than the witnesses proffered by the defendants....
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campos v. Coleman
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Thompson, 118 Conn. App. 140, 154 , 983 A.2d 20 (2009) (prior judicial decision applied to case in which judgment had been rendered and in which appeal from judgment was pending), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 932 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010); cf. Marone v. Water- bury, supra, 244 Conn. 13 (for purposes of determining whether judicial decision applies retroactively to work- ers’ compensation award, award was final and decision did not apply ‘‘when . . . the parties fail[ed] to appeal [from the award] within the statutory time period’’); see also Marone v. Waterbury, supra, 11…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hedge v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
Id.; see also State v. Thomp- son, 118 Conn. App. 140, 149 , 983 A.2d 20 (2009), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 932 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Zen T.
See State v. Jones, 98 Conn. App. 695 , 700–701, 911 A.2d 353 (2006), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 916 , 917 A.2d 1000 (2007); see also State v. Collazo, 115 Conn. App. 752, 757 , 974 A.2d 729 (2009) (doctrine of collateral estoppel barred defendant from relitigating claim decided in prior appeal), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 929 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010).
State of Connecticut
v.
Hubert J. Thompson
v.
Hubert J. Thompson
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 19, 2010.
David J. Reich, special public defender, in support of the petition., Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Vertefeuille.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 140 (AC 30423), is denied.
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.