Kerak v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Corr., 125 A.3d 1196 (Pa. 2015). · Go Syfert
Search
Kerak v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Corr., 125 A.3d 1196 (Pa. 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Corliss, J. (pasuperct, 2016-03-09)
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Corliss, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 759-760 ; see also Coppolino v. Noonan, 102 A.3d 1254, 1279 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2014) (en banc), affirmed, 125 A.3d 1196 (Pa. 2015) (“requirement[s] that registrants promptly update the [Pennsylvania State Police] with current information legitimately serves - 11 - J-S12023-16 [SORNA’s] purpose of promoting public safety” and is “in accordance with the legislative intent of registering, monitoring, and disseminating information regarding sexual offenders.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael P. KERAK
v.
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 19, 2015.
125 A.3d 1196
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2015, the direct appeal is hereby QUASHED.