Commonwealth v. Harris, 168 A.3d 1287 (Pa. 2017).

Commonwealth v. Harris, 168 A.3d 1287 (Pa. 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment Quoted verbatim 1× 12.1 score

“while a bald claim of excessiveness does not present a substantial question for review, a claim that the sentence is manifestly excessive, inflicting too severe a punishment, does present a substantial question.”

21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.

Strongest positive: Com. v. Forshey, M. (pasuperct, 2023-05-15)

Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

2017 2021 2026

Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗

examined Cited as authority (quoted) Com. v. Forshey, M.

Pa. Super. Ct. · 2023 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low

while a bald claim of excessiveness does not present a substantial question for review, a claim that the sentence is manifestly excessive, inflicting too severe a punishment, does present a substantial question.

discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Carney, D.

Pa. Super. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high

See Commonwealth v. Hicks, 151 A.3d 216 (Pa.Super. 2016), appeal denied, 641 Pa. 524 , 168 A.3d 1287 (2017) (explaining claim that sentencing court failed to provide adequate reasons for sentence imposed constituted challenge to discretionary aspects of sentencing).

discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Gooden, T. (2×)

Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high

See Commonwealth v. Hicks, 151 A.3d 216, 223 (Pa. Super. 2016), appeal denied, 168 A.3d 1287 (Pa. 2017).