State v. Serbescu, 424 P.2d 704 (Cal. 1967). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Serbescu, 424 P.2d 704 (Cal. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
186 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Frank (cal, 1985-06-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
examined Cited "see" People v. Frank (4×)
Cal. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
(Ibid.; see People v. Stout (1967) 66 Cal.2d 184, 193 [ 57 Cal.Rptr. 152 , 424 P.2d 704 ].) The affidavit must set forth more than the “ ‘mere conclusion’ ” of the affiant that the items sought are located on the premises to be searched.
discussed Cited "see" People v. Moore (2×)
Cal. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
(People v. One 1960 Cadillac Coupe, supra, 62 Cal.2d 92, 95-96 ; see People v. Stout, 66 Cal.2d 184, 191-192 [ 57 Cal.Rptr. 152 , 424 P.2d 704 ]; People v. Mickelson, 59 Cal.2d 448, 450-451 [ 30 Cal.Rptr. 18 , 380 P.2d 658 ]; cf. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 8 et seq. [ 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 898 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ].) It is clear that the officer detained defendant for questioning, and the only suspicious circumstances relied upon by the officer were that the area was one where narcotic transactions had taken place in the past and that defendant upon seeing the officers’ car turned his back on them, m…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. McFadin (2×)
Cal. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also People v. Castaneda, supra, 1 Cal.App.3d 477, 482 .) *768 “The warrant can be upset only if the affidavit fails as a matter of law to set forth sufficient competent evidence supportive of the magistrate’s finding of probable cause since it is the function of the trier of fact, not the reviewing court, to appraise and weigh evidence when presented by affidavit as well as when presented by oral testimony. [Citations.]” (People v. Stout (1967) 66 Cal.2d 184, 193 [ 57 Cal.Rptr. 152 , 424 P.2d 704 ], accord People v. Benjamin, supra, 71 Cal.2d at p. 302.) We conclude that the affidav…
Estate of EVA C. MANOLIN, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and
v.
ANA SERBESCU, and
S. F. No. 22348.
California Supreme Court.
Mar 8, 1967.
424 P.2d 704
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and John E. Barsell, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for Claimant and Appellant., Garry, Dreyfus & McTernan and Francis J. McTernan for Claimants and Respondents.
Tobriner.
Published
TOBRINER, J.

This case raises the same issue as that posed in Estate of Chichernea, ante, p. 83 [57 Cal.Rptr. 135, 424 P.2d 687], and is controlled by our decision in that ease. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court entered pursuant to its finding that Rumania extends reciprocal inheritance rights to citizens of the United States.

Traynor, C. J., McComb, J., Peters, J., Burke, J., Sullivan, J., and Schauer, J.,* concurred.

Retired Associate Justice of the Supreme Court sitting under assignment by the Chairman of the Judicial Council.