green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Winters
See Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Winters, 13 Conn. App. 712, 722 , 539 A.2d 595 , cert. denied, 200 Conn. 803 , 545 A.2d 1100 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
L. F. Pace & Sons, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Murteza v. State, 7 Conn. App. 196, 202-203 , 508 A.2d 449 , cert. denied, 200 Conn. 803 , 510 A.2d 191 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Assn., Gov. Emp. v. Waterford B. of E., No. 550577 (Jan. 12, 2001)
STANDARD OF REVIEW Section 52-408 of the General Statutes provides that: "An agreement in any written contract, or in a separate writing executed by the parties to any written contract, to settle by arbitration any controversy thereafter arising out of such contract . . . shall be valid, irrevocable and enforceable, except when there exists sufficient cause at law or in equity for the avoidance of written contracts generally." "Arbitration is the voluntary submission, by the interested parties, of an existing or future dispute to a disinterested person or persons for final determination." (Int…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Assn., Gov. Emp. v. Waterford B. of E., No. 551699 (Jan. 12, 2001)
(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Gary Excavating, Inc. v. North Haven , 164 Conn. 119 , 121 , 318 A.2d 84 (1972); see also Harry Skolnick Sons v. Heyman , 7 Conn. App. 175 , 179 , 508 A.2d 64 , cert. denied, 200 Conn. 803 , 510 A.2d 191 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kass v. Schless, No. 553375 (Jun. 27, 2000)
"Arbitration is the voluntary submission, by the interested parties, of an existing or future dispute to a disinterested person or persons for final determination." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Gary Excavating, Inc. v. North Haven , 164 Conn. 119 , 121 , 318 A.2d 84 (1972); see also Harry Skolnick Sons v. Heyman , 7 Conn. App. 175 , 179 , 508 A.2d 64 , cert. denied, 200 Conn. 803 , 510 A.2d 191 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harry Skolnick and Sons
v.
Samuel J. Heyman
v.
Samuel J. Heyman
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 28, 1986.
Jeffrey D. Ginzberg, in support of the petition., Stewart I. Edelstein, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 7 Conn. App. 175, is denied.