Stankiewicz v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 550 A.2d 1084 (Conn. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Stankiewicz v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 550 A.2d 1084 (Conn. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Utay v. G.C.S. Realty, LLC (connappct, 2002-10-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Utay v. G.C.S. Realty, LLC (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kenny v. Dwyer, 16 Conn. App. 58, 64-65 , 546 A.2d 937 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 815 , 550 A.2d 1084 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Abraham
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Benjamin v. Bailey, 234 Conn. 455, 467 , 662 A.2d 1226 (1995); State v. Bailey, 209 Conn. 322, 346 , 551 A.2d 1206 (1988); see also, State v. Banta, 15 Conn. App. 161, 184 , 544 A.2d 1226 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 815 , 550 A.2d 1086 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Benjamin v. Bailey
Conn. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Superintendent of Police v. Freedom of Information Commission, 222 Conn. 621, 629-30 , 609 A.2d 998 (1992); State v. Bailey, 209 Conn. 322, 346 , 551 A.2d 1206 (1988); State v. Anonymous, 179 Conn. 516, 519-21 , 427 A.2d 403 (1980); see also State v. Banta, 15 Conn. App. 161, 184 , 544 A.2d 1266 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 815 , 550 A.2d 1086 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert J. Stankiewicz
v.
Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Montville
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 4, 1988.
550 A.2d 1084
Stanley Maxim Lucas, in support of the petition., Harry B. Heller, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 15 Conn. App. 729, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that if a zoning board gives inadequate reasons for granting a variance, as opposed to giving no reasons whatever, the trial court may search the record to determine whether basis exists for the action taken?”