Kalandyk v. Kalandyk, 568 A.2d 792 (Conn. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Kalandyk v. Kalandyk, 568 A.2d 792 (Conn. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Phillips (connappct, 2007-07-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Phillips (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lo Sacco v. Young, 20 Conn. App. 6, 14-15 , 564 A.2d 610 (affirming trial court’s ruling allowing state to impeach defendant with prior misdemeanor conviction because defendant had opened door), cert. denied, 213 Conn. 808 , 568 A.2d 793 (1989).
cited Cited "see" State v. Jackson, No. Cr 11 96 95224 (Apr. 7, 1998)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lo Sacco v. Young , 20 Conn. App. 6 , 14-15 , cert. denied , 213 Conn. 808 (1989).
discussed Cited "see" Beinhorn v. Saraceno
Conn. App. Ct. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
Although we would treat this cause of action as malicious prosecution; see Lo Sacco v. Young, 20 Conn. App. 6,19-20 , 564 A.2d 610 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 808 , 568 A.2d 793 (1989); we will follow the trial court’s determination that this suit was in false arrest.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mims v. Warden, State Prison
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
The length of time a defendant may have to spend in prison is clearly crucial to a decision of whether or not to plead guilty.” (Emphasis added.) Guadalupe v. Commissioner of Correction, 68 Conn. App. 376, 384 , 791 A.2d 640 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 913 , 796 A.2d 557 (2002); see also State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7, 10 , 404 A.2d 871 (1978). “[T]he purpose of the ‘jail-time’ statutes is to give recognition to the period of presentence time served and to permit the prisoner, in effect, to commence serving his sentence from the time he was compelled to remain in custody due to a mittimus…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alice M. Kalandyk
v.
John M. Kalandyk
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 29, 1989.
568 A.2d 792
JohnM. Kalandyk, pro se, in support of the petition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 801, is denied.