State v. Holloway, 576 A.2d 547 (Conn. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Holloway, 576 A.2d 547 (Conn. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2000 · 2 courts · …n out-of-court statement made after the completion of a criminal act is not admissible under the state of mind exception as to the intent or motive underlying that completed act ⚠ not in text
91 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Soto (connappct, 2000-08-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Soto (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
n out-of-court statement made after the completion of a criminal act is not admissible under the state of mind exception as to the intent or motive underlying that completed act
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Freeney
Conn. · 1994 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
n out-of-court statement made after the completion of a criminal act is not admissible under the state of mind exception as to the intent or motive underlying that completed act
discussed Cited "see" PMG Land Associates, L.P. v. Harbour Landing Condominium Ass'n (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Holloway, 22 Conn. App. 265, 276 , 577 A.2d 1064 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 819 , 576 A.2d 547 (1990). 6 We note that our resolution of this case does not address the strength of the plaintiffs case or whether the case has merit.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Cobb (2×)
Conn. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Holloway, 22 Conn. App. 265, 273 , 577 A.2d 1064 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 819 , 576 A.2d 547 (1990) (ruling of trial court on defendant’s motion for articulation pursuant to § 4051 does not ordinarily provide basis of claim on appeal). 53 Moreover, despite the pendency of this appeal for approximately eight years, the defendant has never sought review of the panel’s ruling.
discussed Cited "see" Maguire v. Maguire (2×)
Conn. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
Although we are not bound by that prior decision; see State v. Holloway, 22 Conn. App. 265, 276 , 577 A.2d 1064 , cert. denied, 215 Conn. 819 , 576 A.2d 547 (1990); under the facts of this case, we see no reason to disturb the decision of the Appellate Court.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Peterson
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 169 (1973); see also State v. Morant, 20 Conn. App. 630, 633 , 569 A.2d 1140 [cert. denied, 215 Conn. 818 , 576 A.2d 547 ] (1990).” State v. Safford, supra, 22 Conn. App. 534 -35.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Verrinder
Vt. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Ryder, 80 Vt. 422, 424-26 , 68 A. 652, 653-54 (1908); State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380, 383, 404 (1859), overruled on other grounds, State v. Briggs, 152 Vt. 531 , 539 n.3, 568 A.2d 779 , 783 n.3 (1989); see also State v. Cato, 574 A.2d 240, 242 (Conn. Ct. App.) (“An out-of-court statement made after the completion of a criminal act is not admissible under the state of mind exception as to the intent or motive underlying that completed act.”), cert. denied, 576 A.2d 547 (Conn. 1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Harold Holloway
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 29, 1990.
576 A.2d 547
William F. Gallagher, special public defender, in support of the petition., Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (2) · Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 265, is denied.