green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.
See Gaudio v. Gaudio, 23 Conn. App. 287, 297 , 580 A.2d 1212 (concluding on basis of equitable principles that count of subsequent action improperly dismissed despite fact that allegations in that count virtually identical to allegations in prior pending action), cert. denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990); Quinebaug Bank v. Tarbox, 20 Conn. 510, 514 (1850) (general rule does not prevail where it appears second action is not vexatious, but is brought for good cause); see also BCBS Goshen Realty, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 22 Conn. App. 407, 409 , 577 A.2d 1101 (1990) (flexibil…
discussed
Cited "see"
Collard and Roe, PC v. Klein
See Gaudio v. Gaudio, 23 *347 Conn. App. 287, 301-302, 580 A.2d 1212 (whether fraudulent conveyance action is an equitable action depends to great extent on whether plaintiff is seeking damages or the setting aside of the conveyance), cert, denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990); General Statutes § 52-484 (“[w]henever any person has, or is alleged to have, any money or other property in his possession which is claimed by two or more persons, either he, or any of the persons claiming the same, may bring a complaint in equity, in the nature of a bill of interpleader”) (Emphasis added.)…
cited
Cited "see"
In re Jessica M.
See Gaudio v. Gaudio, 23 Conn. App. 287, 294 , 580 A.2d 1212 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Zewinski v. Volpe, No. Cv-98-0488391 S (Jun. 4, 2001)
See Gaudio v. Gaudio , 23 Conn. App. 287 , 305-306 , 580 A.2d 1212 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zemina v. Petrol Plus, Inc., No. Cvnh 9712-8590 (Mar. 3, 1998)
Rather, we balance considerations of public policy, common sense, and the chronology and geography of the relevant factors." Zartolas v. Nisenfeld, supra , 184 Conn. 477 ; see Gaudio v. Gaudio, 23 Conn. App. 287 , 298 , 580 A.2d 1212 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Connecticut National Bank v. L & R Realty
See Gaudio v. Gaudio, 23 Conn. App. 287, 294-97 , 580 A.2d 1212 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Winfield Lane Assn. v. New Canaan, No. Cv96 0150884 S (Apr. 26, 1996)
See Gemmell v. New Haven, 32 Conn. App. 280 , 630 A.2d 1331 (1993). "[A] motion to dismiss is the proper vehicle to raise the issue of a prior pending action." (Internal citations omitted.) Gaudio v. Gaudio, 23 Conn. App. 287 , 294 , 580 A.2d 1212 (1990), cert. denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. Commissioner of Correction
See General Statutes § 52-108 (“[a]n action shall not be defeated by the nonjoinder or misjoinder of parties”); see also Gaudio v. Gaudio, 23 Conn. App. 287, 305 , 580 A.2d 1212 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990) (nonjoinder of necessary or indispensable party does not implicate jurisdiction of court).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Whalley Glass Co. v. Nielson Company, No. Cv00 0176028 S (May 18, 2001)
Rather, we balance considerations of public policy, common sense, and the chronology and geography of the relevant factors." Zartolas v. Nisenfeld , supra, 184 Conn. 477 ; see also Gaudio v. Gaudio , 23 Conn. App. 287 , 298 , 580 A.2d 1212 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rjm Group v. Am. Assn. of Franchises Dealers, No. 32 95 48 (Mar. 19, 1998)
See also Gaudio v. Gaudio, 23 Conn. App. 287 , 298 , 580 A.2d 1212 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of Groton, No. 529192 (Dec. 9, 1996)
Although "the prior pending action rule does not truly implicate the subject matter jurisdiction of the court . . . the motion to dismiss [is] the proper device by which to request that the trial court dismiss the second action." (Citations omitted.) Id., 652 n. 4; see also Gaudio v. Gaudio , 23 Conn. App. 287 , 294-95 , 580 A.2d 1212 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crepeau v. Gronager
Finance Corp. of New England, Inc. v. Scard, supra, 100 Conn. 717 -18; Nowsky v. Siedlecki, supra, 83 Conn. 112 ; see also Gaudio v. Gaudio, 23 Conn. App. 287, 302 , 580 A.2d 1212 , cert. denied, 217 Conn. 803 , 584 A.2d 471 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maxine Gaudio
v.
Arthur Gaudio
v.
Arthur Gaudio
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 20, 1990.
Pat Labbadia III, in support of the petition., Gina A. Pasquini, in opposition.
Published
The defendant Frank Eannelli’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 287, is denied.