Lawrence v. New Hampshire Ins., 618 A.2d 528 (Conn. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Lawrence v. New Hampshire Ins., 618 A.2d 528 (Conn. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
71 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hellamns v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc. (connappct, 2013-12-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hellamns v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519, 521 , 615 A.2d 1087 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 923 , 618 A.2d 527 (1992); see also DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLC, 306 Conn. 107 , 116-17, 49 A.3d 951 (2012).
cited Cited "see" Mankert v. Elmatco Products, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519, 523 , 615 A.2d 1087 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 923 , 618 A.2d 527 (1992).
cited Cited "see" Borden v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See New London v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 29 Conn. App. 402, 405 , 615 A.2d 1054 , cert. granted, 224 Conn. 921 , 618 A.2d 528 (1992) (appeal withdrawn March 18, 1993).
cited Cited "see" Kull v. Town of Greenwich inlands/wtlds., No. Cv99 0170583 S (Feb. 15, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See New London v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 29 Conn. App. 402 , 405 , 615 A.2d 1054 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 922 , 618 A.2d 528 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bisson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
To a considerable degree each case must be decided on its own circumstances." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Hellamns v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc. , supra, 147 Conn. App. at 408 -409 , 82 A.3d 677 ; see Considine v. Waterbury , 279 Conn. 830 , 870, 905 A.2d 70 (2006) ; see also Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos. , 29 Conn. App. 519 , 521, 615 A.2d 1087 (whether defendant had constructive notice of condition causing defect turns on whether condition existed for length of time sufficient for defendant's employees, in exercise of due care, to discover defect in time to have remedied it), cert. d…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Considine v. City of Waterbury
Conn. · 2006 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare McCrorey v. Heilpern, 170 Conn. 220, 222 , 365 A.2d 1057 (1976) (concluding that there was no reasonable basis for jury’s finding of constructive notice because plaintiff proffered no evidence that defective condition existed for any period of time before plaintiffs injury), White v. E & F Construction Co., 151 Conn. 110, 113-14 , 193 A.2d 716 (1963) (evidence that defective condition existed for two minutes before accident was insufficient to charge defendant with constructive notice), and Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519, 522 , 615 A.2d 1087 (concluding that trier of f…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Colombo v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519, 522 , 615 A.2d 1087 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 923 , 618 A.2d 527 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McKeone v. Manchester I-84 Assoc. Ltd., No. Cv 98-0583788-S (May 17, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
"A possessor of land has a duty to an invitee to reasonably inspect and maintain the premises in order to render them reasonably safe." Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Assn., Inc., 223 Conn. 323 , 327 , 612 A.2d 1197 (1992); see also Gulycz v. Stop Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519 , 521 , 615 A.2d 1087 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 923 , 618 A.2d 527 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jennifer Lawrence
v.
New Hampshire Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 22, 1992.
618 A.2d 528
Donald P. Guerrini, in support of the petition., Robert R. Sheldon, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 484 (AC 10851), is denied.