State v. Jurgensen, 683 A.2d 398 (Conn. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Jurgensen, 683 A.2d 398 (Conn. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the construction of a contract is usually a question of fact because the interpretation of its language is a search for the intent of the parties, making contractual intent a classic question of fact.”
105 citation events (57 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mafcote Industries v. James River Paper, No. Cv96 0151800 (Jan. 21, 2000) (connsuperct, 2000-01-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Mafcote Industries v. James River Paper, No. Cv96 0151800 (Jan. 21, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the construction of a contract is usually a question of fact because the interpretation of its language is a search for the intent of the parties, making contractual intent a classic question of fact.
cited Cited "see" LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Underwood Towers Ltd. Partnertship
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712 , 732 n.7, 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Nation Electrical Contracting, LLC v. St. Dimitrie Romanian Orthodox Church
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paulus v. LaSala, 56 Conn. App. 139, 148 , 742 A.2d 379 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 928 , 746 A.2d 789 (2000). “[T]here is no right to recover interest in a civil action unless a statute provides for interest. ” Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712, 737 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" CAS Construction Co. v. Town of East Hartford
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712, 729 , 682 A.2d 1026 (“ ‘law is clear that a contract includes not only what is expressly stated therein but also what is necessarily implied from the language used’ ”), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Studio Zee v. the Edge Tattoo Co., No. Cv 01-0449758 S (Mar. 25, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foley v. Huntington Co ., 42 Conn. App. 712 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Ambrogio v. Beaver Road Associates, No. Cv 96-0475509s (Nov. 16, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foley v. Huntington Company , 42 Conn. App. 712 , 728 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Criscuolo v. Mauro Motors, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foley v. Huntington, 42 Conn. App. 712, 722 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Cjp Designs v. Peter Leers Gmbh, No. Cv99 0171751 (Apr. 26, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712 , 732 n. 7, 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Medcalf v. Washington Heights Condominium Ass'n
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712, 724 , 682 A.2d 1026 [cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 ] (1996) . . . .” (Citations omitted.) Suarez v. Sordo, 43 Conn. App. 756, 759 , 685 A.2d 1144 (1996), cert. denied, 240 Conn. 906 , 688 A.2d 334 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.
Conn. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712, 739 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996) (“[§ 37-3a] does not allow prejudgment interest on claims that ... do not involve the wrongful detention of money, such as personal injury claims”); see also Brandewiede v. Emery Worldwide, 890 F. Sup. 79, 82 (D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fagan v. City of Stamford
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Welch v. Stonybrook Gardens Cooperative, Inc. , 158 Conn. App. 185 , 198, 118 A.3d 675 (courts "will not construe a contract's language in such a way that it would lead to an absurd result"), cert. denied, 318 Conn. 905 , 122 A.3d 634 (2015) ; see also Foley v. Huntington Co. , 42 Conn. App. 712 , 729, 682 A.2d 1026 ("[t]he law is clear that a contract includes not only what is expressly stated therein but also what is necessarily implied from the language used" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Keefe v. Norwalk Cove Marina, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
Giorgio v. Nukem, Inc., 31 Conn. App. 169, 173-74 , 624 A.2d 896 (1993); see also 2 Restatement (Second), Contracts § 213 (1981).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712, 733 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Statewide Grievance Committee v. Mozzillo, No. 99-0588198 (Dec. 20, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: compare · confidence low
See General Statutes § 52-550 ; compare Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712 , 729 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, CT Page 16271 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 398 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
Giorgio v. Nukem, Inc., 31 Conn. App. 169, 173-74 , 624 A.2d 896 (1993); see also 2 Restatement (Second), [supra, § 213].” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712, 733 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
KENNETH J. JURGENSEN
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 10, 1996.
683 A.2d 398
Reed D. Rubenstein and Daniel S. Blinn, in support of the petition., LeonF. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 751 (AC 13607), is denied.