green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Stagnitta
See State v. Clark, 48 Conn. App. 812, 825 , 713 A.2d 834 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 921 , 717 A.2d 238 (1998); State v. Gelormino, 24 Conn. App. 563, 571-72 , 590 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 219 Conn. 911 , 593 A.2d 136 (1991); State v. Reyes, supra, 19 Conn. App. 192 -93.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Rivera
See State v. Clark, 48 Conn. App. 812, 829 , 713 A.2d 834 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 921 , 717 A.2d 238 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Grosso v. Grosso
See Rolla v. Rolla, 48 Conn. App. 732 , 735 n.1, 712 A.2d 440 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 921 , 717 A.2d 237 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Krupien v. Rai
See State v. Clark, 48 Conn. App. 812, 831 , 713 A.2d 834 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 921 , 717 A.2d 238 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Torres
See State v. Gibson , 270 Conn. 55 , 67, 850 A.2d 1040 (2004) ("[t]o allow [a] defendant to seek reversal [after] ... his trial strategy has failed would amount to allowing him to induce potentially harmful error, and then ambush the state [and the trial court] with that claim on appeal" [internal quotation marks omitted] ); see also State v. Clark , 48 Conn.App. 812 , 820 n. 6, 713 A.2d 834 ("[a]n appellant cannot create a reviewable claim because his appellate counsel disagrees with the strategy of his trial counsel"), cert. denied, 245 Conn. 921 , 717 A.2d 238 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Andrews
In Malave, we stated that ‘‘we do not prohibit counsel from making appropriate comment, in closing arguments, about the absence of a particular witness, insofar as that witness’ absence may reflect on the weakness of the opposing party’s case. . . . [As] long as counsel does not directly exhort the jury to draw an adverse inference by virtue of the witness’ absence . . . [such comment is allowed].’’ (Footnote omitted.) Id., 739; see also State v. Clark, 48 Conn. App. 812 , 831–32, 713 A.2d 834 (comment on missing witnesses proper when prosecutor did not ask jurors to draw adver…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Radcliffe v. Radcliffe
O’Neill v. O’Neill, 13 Conn. App. 300, 307 , 536 A.2d 978 , cert. denied, 207 Conn. 806 , 540 A.2d 374 (1988); see also Rolla v. Rolla, 48 Conn. App. 732, 738 , 712 A.2d 440 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 921 , 717 A.2d 237 (1998). 6 In O’Neill , we observed that “an equitable distribution of property should take into consideration the plaintiffs contributions to the marriage, including homemaking activities and primary care taking responsibilities”; O’Neill v. O’Neill, supra, 13 Conn. App. 311 ; and that “a determination of each spouses’ contribution within the meaning of General…
HEYWOOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
v.
CITY OF STAMFORD
v.
CITY OF STAMFORD
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 2, 1998.
Kenneth B. Povodator, assistant corporation counsel, in support of the petition., Frank W. LiVolsi, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 920 (AC 17384), is denied.