green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.5 score
“possessor of land has a duty to an invitee to reasonably inspect and maintain the premises in order to render them reasonably safe. . . . in addition, the possessor of land must warn an invitee of dangers that the invitee could not reasonably be expected to discover”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Grady v. Bella Enterprises, Inc., No. Cv00 37 88 38 S (Apr. 23, 2002)
possessor of land has a duty to an invitee to reasonably inspect and maintain the premises in order to render them reasonably safe. . . . in addition, the possessor of land must warn an invitee of dangers that the invitee could not reasonably be expected to discover
discussed
Cited "see"
Wang v. Omni Hotels Management Corporation
See n. 13, supra. Therefore, under Connecticut law, 19 In Kurti v. Becker, 54 Conn. App. 335 , 733 A.2d 916 (1999) , cert. denied, 251 Conn. 909 (1999), an elderly social invitee slipped on homeowners’ icy driveway, breaking his leg, and brought a negligence action against the homeowners to recover for his injuries.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Servello
See State v. Bonsu, 54 Conn. App. 229, 239 , 734 A.2d 596 , cert. denied, 251 Conn. 909 , 739 A.2d 1249 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Grant
As we repeatedly have recognized, ‘‘a question from counsel is not evidence of anything.’’ Zollo v. Commis- sioner of Correction, 133 Conn. App. 266 , 274 n.6, 35 A.3d 337 , cert. granted on other grounds, 304 Conn. 910 , 39 A.3d 1120 (2012); see also State v. Bonsu, 54 Conn. App. 229 , 234–35, 734 A.2d 596 (rejecting claim that prosecutor’s unanswered question about prior con- viction was improperly elicited evidence because ‘‘ques- tions are not evidence’’), cert. denied, 251 Conn. 909 , 739 A.2d 1249 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Considine v. City of Waterbury
Compare McCrorey v. Heilpern, 170 Conn. 220, 222 , 365 A.2d 1057 (1976) (concluding that there was no reasonable basis for jury’s finding of constructive notice because plaintiff proffered no evidence that defective condition existed for any period of time before plaintiffs injury), White v. E & F Construction Co., 151 Conn. 110, 113-14 , 193 A.2d 716 (1963) (evidence that defective condition existed for two minutes before accident was insufficient to charge defendant with constructive notice), and Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519, 522 , 615 A.2d 1087 (concluding that trier of f…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vogel v. State, No. Cv 99 0588391 S (Apr. 18, 2002)
In addition, the possessor of land must warn an invitee of dangers that the invitee could not reasonably be expected to discover." (Citations omitted.) Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Assn., Inc. , 223 Conn. 323 , 327 , 612 A.2d 1197 (1992); see also Kurti v. Becker , 54 Conn. App. 335 , 338 , 733 A.2d 916 , cert. denied, 251 Conn. 909 , 739 A.2d 1248 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
NANA BONSU
v.
NANA BONSU
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 21, 1999.
Raul Davila-Carlos, in support of the petition., Harry Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 229 (AC 17315), is denied.