green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lebrick
See State v. Marrero , 59 Conn. App. 189 , 191-92, 757 A.2d 594 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 934 , 761 A.2d 756 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Webster Bank v. Linsley, No. Cv 97 0260406 S (Aug. 9, 2001)
(2×)
See Boretz v. Segar, 124 Conn. 320 , 323-24 , 199 A. 548 (1938) (equitable defense to mortgage foreclosure is limited to "the transaction under consideration" or "the matter in litigation"): see also Thompson v. Orcutt, 59 Conn. App. 201 , 205-206 , 756 A.2d 332 (same), cert. granted on other grounds, 254 Conn. 934 , 761 A.2d 758 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atlantic Mortgage Corp. v. Linsley, No. Cv97-0260406-S (Jul. 3, 2001)
(2×)
See Boretz v. Segar , 124 Conn. 320 , 323-24 , 199 A. 548 (1938) (equitable defense to mortgage foreclosure is limited to "the transaction under consideration" or "the matter in litigation"); see also Thompson v. Orcutt , 59 Conn. App. 201 , 205-206 , 756 A.2d 332 (same), cert. granted on other grounds, 254 Conn. 934 , 761 A.2d 758 (2000).
GEORGE A. THOMPSON, TRUSTEE
v.
DAVID ORCUTT
v.
DAVID ORCUTT
SC 16398.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 12, 2000.
Bruce S. Beck, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
No opinion found.Click here to view source material.