green
Positive treatment
9.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Solon v. Slater
(2×)
The burden is on the plaintiff to plead and prove at least some improper motive or improper means . . . on the part of the defendants.’’ (Citations omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Solomon v. Aberman, 196 Conn. 359, 365 , 493 A.2d 193 (1985); see American Diamond Exchange, Inc. v. Alpert, 101 Conn. App. 83 , 90–94, 920 A.2d 357 (defendant was liable for tortious interference with business expectancy because she acted with improper motive and employed improper means to divert customers away from plaintiff), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 901 , 931 A.2d 261 (2007). ‘‘Stated simpl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Solon v. Slater
(2×)
The burden is on the plaintiff to plead and prove at least some improper motive or improper means . . . on the part of the defendants.’’ (Citations omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Solomon v. Aberman, 196 Conn. 359, 365 , 493 A.2d 193 (1985); see American Diamond Exchange, Inc. v. Alpert, 101 Conn. App. 83 , 90–94, 920 A.2d 357 (defendant was liable for tortious interference with business expectancy because she acted with improper motive and employed improper means to divert customers away from plaintiff), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 901 , 931 A.2d 261 (2007). ‘‘Stated simpl…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Jaime S.
See In re Ashley E., 62 Conn. App. 307, 312-13 , 771 A.2d 160 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 910 , 772 A.2d 601 (2001). 12 General Statutes § 45a-717 (h) provides: “Except in the case where termination is based on consent, in determining whether to terminate parental rights under this section, the court shall consider and shall make written findings regarding: (1) The timeliness, nature and extent of services offered, provided and made available to the parent and the child by a child-placing agency to facilitate the reunion of the child with the parent; (2) the terms of any applicable court orde…
discussed
Cited "see"
Laplace v. Demarco, No. Cv 01-0095009 S (Oct. 16, 2002)
(2×)
See Biro v. Hirsch , 62 Conn. App. 11 , 20 , 771 A.2d 129 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 908 , 772 A.2d 601 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Marro
(2×)
See Biro v. Hirsch, 62 Conn. App. 11 , 16 n.7, 771 A.2d 129 (affirming proper result for different reason), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 908 , 772 A.2d 601 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pfister v. Madison Beach Hotel, LLC
This court con- cluded that the trial court had correctly determined that ‘‘the belated effort of the [landowners] in moving the five trailers onto their land, within twenty-four hours of the time when the regulations were to become operative, did not create an existing nonconforming use.’’ Id., 684 ; see also Wing v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 61 Conn. App. 639, 645 , 767 A.2d 131 (keeping horses on residential property was not valid nonconforming use when ‘‘[t]here [was] no indication in the record that horses were ever kept on the . . . property prior to [the effective date of the…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Lukas K.
Compare In re Ashley E., 62 Conn. App. 307, 314 , 771 A.2d 160 (applying abandonment under § 45a-717 [f] [1], currently § 45a-717 [g] [2] [A]), cert. denied, 256 Conn. 910 , 772 A.2d 601 (2001) and In re Valerie D., 223 Conn. 492, 531 , 613 A.2d 748 (1992) (applying no ongoing parent-child relationship under § 45a-717 [f] [3], currently § 45a-717 [g] [2] [C]) with In re S.D., 115 Conn. App. 111, 122 , 972 A.2d 258 (2009) *484 (applying abandonment under § 17a-112 [j] [3] [A]) and In re Christian P., 98 Conn. App. 264, 269-70 , 907 A.2d 1261 (2006) (applying no ongoing parent-child relatio…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. Tager
(2×)
Pursuant to Connecticut’s jurisprudence, there is, precisely speaking, no independent claim for civil conspiracy. 34 “Rather, [t]he action is for damages caused by acts committed pursuant to a formed conspiracy rather than by the conspiracy itself.” (Internal quotation *101 marks omitted.) Macomber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp., 277 Conn. 617, 636, 894 A.2d 240 (2006). “[T]he purpose of a civil conspiracy claim is to impose civil liability for damages on those who agree to join in a tortfeasor’s conduct and, thereby, become liable for the ensuing damage, simply by virtue of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Megin v. ZONING BD. OF APP. OF NEW MILFORD
See, e.g., Wing v. Zoning Board of *608 Appeals, 61 Conn. App. 639, 643 , 767 A.2d 131 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 908 , 772 A.2d 602 (2001). “[Cjourts are not to substitute their judgment for that of the board, and . . . the decisions of local boards will not be disturbed as long as honest judgment has been reasonably and fairly made after a full hearing . . . .” (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Jaser v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 43 Conn. App. 545, 547 , 684 A.2d 735 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dollard v. Board of Education
(2×)
See, e.g., Biro v. Hirsch, 62 Conn. App. 11, 21 , 771 A.2d 129 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 908 , 772 A.2d 601 (2001); Muniz v. Kravis, 59 Conn. App. 704, 711 , 757 A.2d 1207 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
RICHARD KENNISON
v.
RICHARD KENNISON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 18, 2001.
Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 256 (AC 20517), is denied.