Goodrum v. Comm'r of Corr., 782 A.2d 136 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Goodrum v. Comm'r of Corr., 782 A.2d 136 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: J.R. v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2008-02-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" J.R. v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Goodrum v. Commissioner of Correction, 63 Conn. App. 297, 300 , 776 A.2d 461 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 902 , 782 A.2d 136 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Rodriguez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Goodrum v. Commissioner of Correction, 63 Conn. App. 297, 306 , 776 A.2d 461 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 902 , 782 A.2d 136 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Iovieno v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
Recognizing that there is a strong presumption that the trial strategy employed by a criminal defendant’s counsel is reasonable and is a result of the exercise of professional judgment; see Goodrum v. Commissioner of Correction, 63 Conn. App. 297, 315 , 776 A.2d 461 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 902 , 782 A.2d 136 (2001); we conclude that the petitioner has not demonstrated that the habeas court’s determination that his counsel did not perform deficiently when he elected not to call Sisson as a witness was not debatable among jurists of reason.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Pereira
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Goodrum v. Commissioner of Correction, 63 Conn. App. 297, 309-10 , 776 A.2d 461 (phrase identifies permissive inference rather than forced conclusion), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 902 , 782 A.2d 136 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Woodruff v. Riley, No. Cv 01 0085608s (Jul. 17, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare with Lyman v. Lodrini , 63 Conn. App. 739 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 902 (2001) (presumption of receipt rebutted by testimony that defendant's no longer received mail at address.) Nevertheless, the defendant did not file this motion within the four month period mandated under § 52-212 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STANLEY GOODRUM
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 13, 2001.
782 A.2d 136
Sandra J. Crowell, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Denise B. Smoker, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The petitioner Stanley Goodrum’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 297 (AC 19413), is denied.

SULLIVAN, C. J., and NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.