Guadalupe v. Comm'r of Corr., 853 A.2d 525 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Guadalupe v. Comm'r of Corr., 853 A.2d 525 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. CARACOGLIA (connappct, 2012-03-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. CARACOGLIA
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bryant, 17 Conn. App. 525, 527 , 554 A.2d 1105 (1989). “[T]he trial court’s decision regarding ... a Brady violation will be overturned only upon a finding of clear abuse of discretion.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Sells, 82 Conn. App. 332, 351 , 844 A.2d 235 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 911 , 853 A.2d 529 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Kemah
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sells, 82 Conn. App. 332, 347 , 844 A.2d 235 (concluding that prosecutor improperly turned over to court, instead of directly to defendant, confidential records including exculpatory evidence to satisfy Brady obligations, and that procedure for in camera review of privileged records “does not apply when the complainant has waived his rights to confidentiality in the records and the records have been directly turned over to the prosecutor’s office”), cert. denied, 270 Conn. 911 , 853 A.2d 529 (2004). 7 The terms “confidential” and “privilege” can have different meanin…
cited Cited "see" State v. Bryant
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sells, 82 Conn. App. 332, 338 , 844 A. 2d 235 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 911 , 853 A.2d 529 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ortiz
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sells, 82 Conn. App. 332, 351 , 844 A.2d 235 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 911 , 853 A.2d 529 (2004); State v. Sitkiewicz, 64 Conn. App. 108, 114 , 779 A.2d 782 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 909 , 782 A.2d 1250 (2001); State v. St.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kendall (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Perez, 78 Conn. App. 610, 628 , 828 A.2d 626 (2003), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 901 , 859 A.2d 565 (2004); see also State v. Sells, 82 Conn. App. 332, 341 , 844 A.2d 235 (“[i]n a case that essentially reduces to which of two conflicting stories is true, it may be reasonable to infer, and hence to argue that one of the two sides is lying” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 270 Conn. 911 , 853 A.2d 529 (2004). 3 The defendant also claims that the prosecutor denigrated the defense case by characterizing it, during rebuttal closing argument, as “ludicrous” and “incr…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eduardo GUADALUPE
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 7, 2004.
853 A.2d 525
Published

James M. Fox, special public defender, in support of the petition.

[*526] Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Eduardo Guadalupe's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn.App. 180, 849 A.2d 883 (2004), is denied.