green
Positive treatment
Trending · 53 recent citers
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Avon v. Sastre
See Lewin v. Freedom of Information Commission, 91 Conn. App. 521, 525 , 881 A.2d 519 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 921 , 888 A.2d 88 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Lindquist v. Freedom of Information Commission
See Lewin v. Freedom of Infor- mation Commission, 91 Conn. App. 521, 526 , 881 A.2d 519 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 921 , 888 A.2d 88 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scalora v. Scalora
Thus, this court has held it to be an abuse of discretion for a trial court to issue financial orders in a marital dissolution case without considering the parties' financial circumstances where the parties had submitted evidence on the subject; see id. (trial court erred in failing to consider defendant's financial affidavit in ruling on plaintiff's postdissolution motion to terminate, reduce, or modify his alimony obligation to defendant); Cuneo v. Cuneo , 12 Conn. App. 702 , 709, 533 A.2d 1226 (1987) (trial court erred in refusing to consider defendant's updated financial affidavit in issui…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hull v. FONCK
See Dockter v. Slowik, 91 Conn. App. 448, 456-57 , 881 A.2d 479 (actual knowledge of well’s limited ability to produce water made § 20-327b misrepresentation actionable), cert. denied, 276 Conn. 919 , 888 A.2d 87 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Putman v. Kennedy
(2×)
When a statute is not plain and unambiguous, we also look for interpretive guidance to the legislative history and circumstances surrounding its enactment, to the legislative policy it was designed to implement, and to its relationship to existing legislation and common law principles governing the same general subject matter . . . .” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Pizzuto v. Commissioner of Mental Retardation, 283 Conn. 257, 264-65 , 927 A.2d 811 (2007); see Gervais v. Gervais, 91 Conn. App. 840, 849-50 , 882 A.2d 731 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 919 , 888 A.2d 88 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Toland v. Toland
(2×)
See, e.g., Gervais v. Gervais , 91 Conn. App. 840 , 843-44, 882 A.2d 731 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 919 , 888 A.2d 88 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spencer v. Spencer
(2×)
See, e.g., Gervais v. Gervais , 91 Conn. App. 840 , 854, 882 A.2d 731 (referring to first requirement of § 46b-86 [b] as "cohabitation"), cert. denied, 276 Conn. 919 , 888 A.2d 88 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lapointe v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., Dockter v. Slowik, 91 Conn. App. 448 , 459 and n.7, 881 A.2d 479 (procedural facts from court file are subject to judicial notice), cert. denied, 276 Conn. 919 , 888 A.2d 87 (2005); Grant v. Commis- sioner of Correction, 87 Conn. App. 814, 817 , 867 A.2d 145 (‘‘It is well known that appellate courts do not make findings of fact. . . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniel R. GERVAIS
v.
Pamela M. GERVAIS.
v.
Pamela M. GERVAIS.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 9, 2005.
Published
Dina M. Menchetti, in support of the petition.
Campbell D. Barrett, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn.App. 840, 882 A.2d 731 (2005), is denied.