State v. Smith, 925 A.2d 1102 (Conn. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Smith, 925 A.2d 1102 (Conn. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Kerlyn T. (connappct, 2019-07-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Kerlyn T.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smith, 100 Conn. App. 313, 324 , 917 A.2d 1017 (in determining whether defendant validly waived right to jury trial, court considered fact that defendant ‘‘had some familiarity with the court system, having a lengthy criminal history that included robberies’’), cert. denied, 282 Conn. 920 , 925 A.2d 1102 (2007).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bumgarner-Ramos
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smith , 100 Conn. App. 313 , 320 n.6, 917 A.2d 1017 ("[a] party cannot preserve grounds for reversing a trial court decision by raising them for the first time in a postverdict motion" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 282 Conn. 920 , 925 A.2d 1102 (2007).
discussed Cited "see" Fennelly v. Norton (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smith, 100 Conn.App. 313, 325 , 917 A.2d 1017 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 920 , 925 A.2d 1102 (2007). [6] Practice Book § 25-13(a) requires in relevant part that a motion to dismiss "shall always be filed with a supporting memorandum of law. . . ." [7] Pursuant to Practice Book § 25-8(b), Practice Book §§ 10-59, 10-60 and 10-61 "shall apply to family matters. . . ." [8] Peabody sought to amend its complaint by order of judicial authority, which is permitted under Practice Book § 10-60.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Scott
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
As this court previously has recognized, ‘‘[t]he fact that the defendant was represented by counsel and that he conferred with counsel concerning the right to waive his right to a jury trial supports a conclusion that his waiver was constitutionally sound.’’ State v. Tocco, supra, 120 Conn. App. 780 ; see also State v. Smith, 100 Conn. App. 313, 324 , 917 A.2d 1017 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 920 , 925 A.2d 1102 (2007).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jeremy D.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Smith, 100 Conn. App. 313, 324 , 917 A.2d 1017 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 920 , 925 A.2d 1102 (2007); see also State v. Cobb, 251 Conn. 285, 373 , 743 A.2d 1 (1999) (“[although the presence of counsel does not by itself mean that the defendant’s interests and rights are protected . . . [t]he fact of counsel being present and having advised the defendant [concerning jury waiver] is a factor to be considered in determining the question of the need for or sufficiency of any admonition given by the court” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 841 , 12…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Tocco
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Smith, 100 Conn. App. 313, 324 , 917 A.2d 1017 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 920 , 925 A.2d 1102 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Joseph SMITH.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 22, 2007.
925 A.2d 1102
Published

Elizabeth M. Inkster, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Sarah Hanna, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100 Conn.App. 313, 917 A.2d 1017 (2007), is denied.