Cullen v. Pennsylvania R., 279 F. 1016 (2d Cir. 1922). · Go Syfert
Search
Cullen v. Pennsylvania R., 279 F. 1016 (2d Cir. 1922). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: H. H. Scott, Inc. v. Annapolis Electroacoustic Corp. (mdd, 1961-06-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1926 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1926 1976 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" H. H. Scott, Inc. v. Annapolis Electroacoustic Corp.
D. Maryland · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See Call-man, op. cit., p. 1272, quoted at length in I. above, and the eases cited in note 3, supra. Nor do defendants’ proposals adequately protect the good will which plaintiff has built up over the years by producing and selling high quality components under the name H.
discussed Cited "see" Wally Gray and Maryland Casualty Company, a Corporation, and Northern Commercial Company, a Corporation v. Travelers Indemnity Company, a Corporation
9th Cir. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Andrew Jergens Co. v. Woodbury, Inc., D.C.Del.1921, 273 F. 952, 959 , affirmed 3 Cir., 1922, 279 F. 1016 , certiorari denied 1922, 260 U.S. 728 , 43 S.Ct. 92 , 67 L.Ed. 484 ; Peavy-Byrnes Lumber Co., Inc. v. Long-Bell Lumber Co., D.C.W.D.La.1944, 55 F.Supp. 654, 659 , affirmed 5 Cir., 1945, 150 F.2d 49 ; Thomas Hoist Co. v. William J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CULLEN
v.
PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.
No. 166.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Feb 28, 1922.
279 F. 1016
Maeklin, Brown, Purdy & Van Wyck and Pierre M. Brown, all of New York Oity, for appellant. Buriinghain, Veedor, Hasten & Fearey, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and Ralph W. Brown, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.