George Stefanelli v. Duane E. Minard, Jr., Prosecutor for Essex Cnty., New Jersey Jerry Malanga, Joseph Maglione & Frank D'InnocenzIo v. Duane E. Minard, Jr., Prosecutor for Essex Cnty., New Jersey, 184 F.2d 575 (3rd Cir. 1950). · Go Syfert
George Stefanelli v. Duane E. Minard, Jr., Prosecutor for Essex Cnty., New Jersey Jerry Malanga, Joseph Maglione & Frank D'InnocenzIo v. Duane E. Minard, Jr., Prosecutor for Essex Cnty., New Jersey, 184 F.2d 575 (3rd Cir. 1950). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Docket No. 04-4066-Cv (ca2, 2006-07-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950 1988 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Docket No. 04-4066-Cv
2d Cir. · 2006 · confidence medium
Co., 184 F.2d 575, 575 (3rd Cir.1950); Strachman v. Palmer, 177 F.2d 427, 429 (1st Cir.1949); Condakes v. Smith, 281 F.Supp. 1014, 1015 (D.Mass.1968), and have tended instead to adopt the reasoning of an influential Pennsylvania Superior Court decision, Alwine v. Pennsylvania R.
cited Cited "see" Public Housing Administration v. Bristol Township
E.D. Pa. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See Stefanelli v. Minard, 3 Cir., 1950, 184 F.2d 575 , affirmed 1951, 342 U.S. 117, 120-122 , 72 S.Ct. 118 , 96 L.Ed. 138 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Trevor A. Waldron v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 596; see also Roldan v. Racette, 984 F.2d 85, 87-88 (2d Cir.1993) (collecting cases). 15 However, both Campillo and Fernandez-Collado explicitly drew a distinction from Chung Young Chew v. Boyd, 309 F.2d 857, 865 (9th Cir.1962) and Slavik v. Miller, 89 F.Supp. 575, 576 (W.D.Pa.), aff'd, 184 F.2d 575 (3d Cir.1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 955 , 71 S.Ct. 566 , 95 L.Ed. 688 (1951), two cases in which the INS was deemed to have "technical custody" over petitioners.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George Stefanelli
v.
Duane E. Minard, Jr., Prosecutor for Essex County, New Jersey Jerry Malanga, Joseph Maglione and Frank D'InnocenzIo v. Duane E. Minard, Jr., Prosecutor for Essex County, New Jersey
10212_1.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Oct 31, 1950.
184 F.2d 575
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

184 F.2d 575

George STEFANELLI, Appellant,
v.
Duane E. MINARD, Jr., Prosecutor for Essex County, New
Jersey, et al.
Jerry MALANGA, Joseph Maglione and Frank D'Innocenzio, Appellants,
v.
Duane E. MINARD, Jr., Prosecutor for Essex County, New Jersey, et al.

Nos. 10211, 10212.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 19, 1950.
Decided Oct. 31, 1950.

Anthony A. Calandra, Newark, N.J., for appellants.

C. William Caruso, Newark, N.J., for Minard.

Vincent J. Casale, Newark, N.J., (Charles Handler, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for other appellees.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The appeals in the instant cases are without merit. Every question here raised by the appellants can be asserted by them in the New Jersey State cOurts and the way to the Supreme Court of the United States lies open. Federal courts should not enjoin criminal proceedings in state courts save in exceptional cases to prevent irreparable injury which is clear and imminent. Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157, 63 S.Ct. 877, 87 L.Ed. 1324. As to the application of the principles of the Fourth Amendment to the cases at bar see Wolf v. People of State of Colorado, 338 U.S. 25, 69 S.Ct. 1359, 93 L.Ed. 1782. The judgments will be affirmed.