Tyrrell v. United States, 191 F.2d 154 (9th Cir. 1951). · Go Syfert
Tyrrell v. United States, 191 F.2d 154 (9th Cir. 1951). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ambler v. Flathead Conservation District (mtd, 2025-02-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ambler v. Flathead Conservation District
D. Mont. · 2025 · confidence medium
The Ninth Circuit agreed, concluding that “California and the United States were intending by the statutes of cession and acceptance to accomplish unified policing of privately owned and public lands within the park boundaries for the public good in administering the National Park.” Peterson, 191 F.2d at 156.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Barrett v. United States
2d Cir. · 1986 · confidence medium
Ex Parte Collett, 337 U.S. 55, 71 , 69 S.Ct. 959 , 952, 93 L.Ed. 1207 (1949) (no property right established by remedial provision); Gibbes, supra, 290 U.S. at 332, 54 S.Ct. at 142 ; Petersen v. United States, 191 F.2d 154, 157 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 885 , 72 S.Ct. 174 , 96 L.Ed. 664 (1951); Standard Oil of Cal. v. United States, 107 F.2d 402, 418 (9th Cir.1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 654 , 60 S.Ct. 469 , 84 L.Ed. 1003 (1940).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Carl E. Brown
8th Cir. · 1977 · confidence medium
Co. v. Lowe, 114 U.S. 525, 541-42 , 5 S.Ct. 995 , 29 L.Ed. 264 (1885); Petersen v. United States, 191 F.2d 154, 156-57 (9th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom, California v. United States, 342 U.S. 885 , 72 S.Ct. 174 , 96 L.Ed. 664 (1951).
cited Cited "see" Henry E. Pratti v. United States
9th Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tyrrell v. United States, 9 Cir., 191 F.2d 154 , Rules 38(c) and 46(a) (2), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tyrrell
v.
United States
12991.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 6, 1951.
191 F.2d 154
Philander Brooks Beadle, Mortem L. Silvers, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Chauncey Tramutolo, U. S. Atty., Donald B. Constine, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Bone, Healy, Mathews, Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted for violating 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 462(a). He had a jury trial and was found guilty. Thereupon a judgment was entered sentencing him to be imprisoned for three years. He appealed from that judgment on Tune 1, 1951. The record on appeal was filed and the appeal was docketed in this court on June 26, 1951. On July 24, 1951, appellant applied to this court for bail pending appeal: No application for bail pending appeal has been made to the court below or a judge thereof. Suc'h an application to the court below or a judge thereof was practicable on June 1, 1951, and at all times thereafter and is still practicable, despite the filing of the record on appeal and the docketing of the appeal in this court. See Rules 38(c) and 46(a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S. C.A. The application made to this court on July 24, 1951, is therefore denied without prejudice.