United R.R. Operating Crafts, a R.R. Labor Org. Nat'l in Scope, & John J. Gallagher, Jr., Howard T. Hunt, Clifford W. Carlson & Robert T. Owens, Individually & on Behalf of All Members of the Ry. Org. as a Class Who Are Too Numerous to Be Made Parties v. William Wyer, as Tr. of the Long Island R.R. Co., a Corp., Bhd. of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen & Bhd. of Locomotive Engineers, Bhd. of R.R. Trainmen, Intervenor-Appellee. United R.R. Operating Crafts, a R.R. Labor Org., Nat'l in Scope, & Robert M. Harkinson & Arthur T. Beswick, Individually & on Behalf of All Members of the Ry. Org. as a Class Who Are Too Numerous to Be Made Parties & Wilton A. Ryder v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R.R. Co., a Corp., Bhd. of R.R. Trainmen, Intervenor-Appellee, 205 F.2d 153 (2d Cir. 1953). · Go Syfert
Search
United R.R. Operating Crafts, a R.R. Labor Org. Nat'l in Scope, & John J. Gallagher, Jr., Howard T. Hunt, Clifford W. Carlson & Robert T. Owens, Individually & on Behalf of All Members of the Ry. Org. as a Class Who Are Too Numerous to Be Made Parties v. William Wyer, as Tr. of the Long Island R.R. Co., a Corp., Bhd. of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen & Bhd. of Locomotive Engineers, Bhd. of R.R. Trainmen, Intervenor-Appellee. United R.R. Operating Crafts, a R.R. Labor Org., Nat'l in Scope, & Robert M. Harkinson & Arthur T. Beswick, Individually & on Behalf of All Members of the Ry. Org. as a Class Who Are Too Numerous to Be Made Parties & Wilton A. Ryder v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R.R. Co., a Corp., Bhd. of R.R. Trainmen, Intervenor-Appellee, 205 F.2d 153 (2d Cir. 1953). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Williams v. Government of the Virgin Islands (vid, 2009-06-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Williams v. Government of the Virgin Islands
D.V.I. · 2009 · confidence medium
Appx. 452, 454 (3d Cir. 2003) “[W]e do not make an independent determination of the witnesses’ credibility.”); United States v. Gross, 511 F.2d 910 , 920 n.15 (3d Cir. 1975) (“Appellant’s numerous contentions challenging the sufficiency of the evidence relate merely to the credibility of [witnesses], which we cannot evaluate for ourselves on appeal.”); United States v. Brawer, 205 F.2d 153, 153 (3d Cir. 1953) (“Since all defendants took the stand, the credibility of each was fully explored by lengthy cross-examination both as to prior inconsistent statements and as to past crimin…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Williams v. Government of the Virgin Islands
D.V.I. · 2008 · confidence medium
Appx. 452, 454 (3d Cir. 2003) “[W]e do not make an independent determination of the witnesses’ credibility.”); United States v. Gross, 511 F.2d 910 , 920 n.15 (3d Cir. 1975) (“Appellant’s numerous contentions challenging the sufficiency of the evidence relate merely to the credibility of [witnesses], which we cannot evaluate for ourselves on appeal.”); United States v. Brawer, 205 F.2d 153, 153 (3d Cir. 1953) (“Since all defendants took the stand, the credibility of each was fully explored by lengthy cross-examination both as to prior inconsistent statements and as to past crimin…
discussed Cited "see" Pennsylvania Railroad v. Rychlik
SCOTUS · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See pp. 487-488, infra. [6] 229 F. 2d 171 . [7] The briefs below show that the validity of this premise was not challenged by any of the parties before the Court of Appeals. [8] As to this issue the Court of Appeals relied on its previous decision in United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer, 205 F. 2d 153 . [9] Neither in the Court of Appeals, nor here, has Rychlik claimed that his membership in the Switchmen's Union made his discharge illegal.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United Railroad Operating Crafts, a Railroad Labor Organization National in Scope, and John J. Gallagher, Jr., Howard T. Hunt, Clifford W. Carlson and Robert T. Owens, Individually and on Behalf of All Members of the Railway Organization as a Class Who Are Too Numerous to Be Made Parties
v.
William Wyer, as Trustee of the Long Island Railroad Company, a Corporation, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Intervenor-Appellee. United Railroad Operating Crafts, a Railroad Labor Organization, National in Scope, and Robert M. Harkinson and Arthur T. Beswick, Individually and on Behalf of All Members of the Railway Organization as a Class Who Are Too Numerous to Be Made Parties and Wilton A. Ryder v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, a Corporation, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Intervenor-Appellee
22740-22741.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 23, 1953.
205 F.2d 153
Published

205 F.2d 153

UNITED RAILROAD OPERATING CRAFTS, A Railroad Labor Organization National in Scope, and John J. Gallagher, Jr., Howard T. Hunt, Clifford W. Carlson and Robert T. Owens, individually and on behalf of all members of the plaintiff Railway Organization as a class who are too numerous to be made parties plaintiffs, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
William WYER, as Trustee of The Long Island Railroad Company, a corporation, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Defendants-Appellees, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Intervenor-Appellee.
UNITED RAILROAD OPERATING CRAFTS, a Railroad Labor Organization, National in Scope, and Robert M. Harkinson and Arthur T. Beswick, Individually and on behalf of all members of the Plaintiff Railway Organization as a class who are too numerous to be made parties plaintiffs, and Wilton A. Ryder, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Intervenor-Appellee.

No. 285.

No. 286.

Docket 22740-22741.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 4, 1953.

Decided June 23, 1953.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Edward A. Conger, Judge.

1

From an order vacating temporary restraining orders, denying a preliminary injunction, and dismissing a complaint against William Wyer, Trustee, et al., for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, and from a similar order in an action against The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, et al., the plaintiffs have taken companion appeals.

2

Maurice R. Whitebook, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants United Railroad Operating Crafts et al.

3

Richard R. Bongartz, New York City, William F. McNulty and William J. O'Brien, New York City, of counsel, for defendant-appellee, William Wyer, as trustee of Long Island R. Co.

4

Polier & Midonick, — Shad Polier, Millard L. Midonick and David Bromberg, New York City, Clifford D. O'Brien and Ruth Weyand, Chicago, Ill., and Harold C. Heiss, and Russell B. Day, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for defendants-appellees Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and for Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers.

5

Bernard L. Alderman, New York City, for intervenor-appellee, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen.

6

Edward R. Brumley, New York City, for defendant-appellee, New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.

7

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

8

PER CURIAM.

9

The orders are affirmed on the opinion of the District Court in United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer, Trustee, 115 F. Supp. ___.