green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wally Kelberine v. Societe Internationale, Etc., Interhandel, Etc.
See Societe Internationale Pour Partici-pations Industrielles, etc. v. Rogers, 357 U.S. 197 , 78 S.Ct. 1087 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1255 (1958), reversing Societe Internationale, etc. v. Brownell, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 148 , 243 F.2d 254 (1957); Societe Internationale, etc. v. McGranery, 111 F.Supp. 435 (D.D.C.1953), aff’d sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Boomhower, Inc. v. American Automobile Insurance Company and Dennis J. Kane
See also Boomhower, Inc., v. Boomhower, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 148 , 243 F.2d 254 . 2 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Boomhower, Inc., a Corporation
v.
D. W. Boomhower
v.
D. W. Boomhower
13518_1.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
May 10, 1957.
243 F.2d 254
Published
BOOMHOWER, Inc., a corporation, Appellant.
v.
D. W. BOOMHOWER, Appellee.
No. 13518.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued March 27, 1957.
Decided April 18, 1957.
Petition for Rehearing Denied May 10, 1957.
Mr. Thaddeus G. Benton, New York City, with whom Mr. Russell Hardy, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Joseph C. Turco, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and BAZELON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
[*~254]1
Appellant's principal contention is that the District Court's findings are not supported by the evidence. We find no basis for this contention.
[*~255]2
Affirmed.