Las Palmas Food Co., Inc. v. Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co., 245 F.2d 874 (9th Cir. 1957). · Go Syfert
Search
Las Palmas Food Co., Inc. v. Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co., 245 F.2d 874 (9th Cir. 1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kismet Acquisition v. Alejandro Diaz-Barba (ca9, 2014-06-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Kismet Acquisition v. Alejandro Diaz-Barba
9th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., 146 F.Supp. 594, 604 (S.D.Cal.1956), adopted by 245 F.2d 874 (9th Cir.1957) (per curiam).
discussed Cited "see" Mars Incorporated v. Kabushiki-Kaisha Nippon Conlux
Fed. Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., 146 F.Supp. 594, 603 (S.D.Cal.1956) (this section “necessarily presupposes a claim of unfair competition arising otherwise than ‘under the copyright, patent, and trademark laws,’ since, unless so interpreted, § 1338(b) would confer no jurisdiction additional to that already conferred by section 1338(a) and so would be mere surplusage.”), aff'd, 245 F.2d 874 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 927 , 78 S.Ct. 384 , 2 L.Ed.2d 357 (1958).
discussed Cited "see" American Rice, Inc. v. The Arkansas Rice Growers Cooperative Association, D/B/A Riceland Foods
5th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., S.D.Cal.1956, 146 F.Supp. 594, 602 , aff’d per curiam, 9 Cir.1957, 245 F.2d 874 , cert. denied, 1958, 355 U.S. 927 , 78 S.Ct. 384 , 2 L.Ed.2d 357 . 12 Riceland’s reliance on Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. T.
discussed Cited "see" Wells Fargo & Company v. Wells Fargo Express Company (2×)
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., Inc., 245 F.2d 874 (9th Cir. 1957), aff'g per curiam and adopting by reference, 146 F.Supp. 594, 600-02 (S.D.Cal.1956). 96 In the instant case, the funds loaned by A.G. in America presumably came from abroad into the United States, much the same as did the chili cans in Ramirez.
discussed Cited "see" Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co. (2×)
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., Inc., 245 F.2d 874 (9th Cir. 1957), aff’g per curiam and adopting by reference, 146 F.Supp. 594, 600-02 (S.D.Cal.1956).
cited Cited "see" Gerard A. Harrison and Harrison Ranch, Inc. v. Carey Prather and William Prather
5th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ramirez & Feraud *273 Chili Company v. LasPalmas Food Company, 146 F.Supp. 594 (D.C.), affirmed, 245 F.2d 874 (9th Cir. 1957); Williams v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg.
discussed Cited "see" Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Frolich
S.D. Cal. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., Inc., D.C.S.D.Cal.1956, 146 F.Supp. 594 , at page 605, citing Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson, affirmed per curiam, 9 Cir., 245 F.2d 874 , certiorari denied 355 U.S. 927 , 78 S.Ct. 384 , 2 L.Ed.2d 357 . 13 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." A. T. Cross Co. v. Sunil Trading Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., 146 F.Supp. 594 (S.D.Cal. 1956), aff’d 245 F.2d 874 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 927 , 78 S.Ct. 384 , 2 L.Ed.2d 357 (1958). 5 This is precisely what the defendants did in the instant case.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Walt Disney Productions v. The Air Pirates
9th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e. g., Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Co., 146 F.Supp. 594 (S.D.Cal.1956), affirmed, 245 F.2d 874 (9th Cir. 1957), certiorari denied, 355 U.S. 927 , 78 S!Ct. 384, 2 L.Ed.2d 357 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Las Palmas Food Company, Inc., a Corporation Pablo Baca Gavaldon and Ralph Worthington
v.
Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co., a Co-Partnership Composed of Frank Feraud and E. C. Feraud
15306_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jul 29, 1957.
245 F.2d 874
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

245 F.2d 874

LAS PALMAS FOOD COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation; Pablo Baca Gavaldon and Ralph Worthington, Appellants,
v.
RAMIREZ & FERAUD CHILI CO., a Co-Partnership Composed of Frank Feraud and E. C. Feraud, Appellees.

No. 15306.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

July 29, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; William C. Mathes, Judge.

Mason & Howard, C. Loy Mason and Paul P. Selvin, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Harris, Kiech, Foster & Harris, Warren L. Kern and Walton Eugene Tinsley, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before LEMMON, CHAMBERS, and BARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

All of the points relied upon for reversal on this appeal were ably considered and disposed of by the trial judge in his opinion reported at D.C., 146 F.Supp. 594. We adopt it as our own. For the reasons therein stated, the judgment is

2

Affirmed.