Leonard Dixon v. United States, 253 F.2d 877 (D.C. Cir. 1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Leonard Dixon v. United States, 253 F.2d 877 (D.C. Cir. 1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Charter Advanced Servs. (MN), LLC v. Lange (ca8, 2018-09-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Charter Advanced Servs. (MN), LLC v. Lange
8th Cir. · 2018 · confidence medium
Ass’n, 253 F.2d 877, 886 (D.C.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. New Prime, Inc.
8th Cir. · 1999 · confidence medium
Ass’n, 253 F.2d 877, 886 (D.C.Cir.1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 930 , 80 S.Ct. 372 , 4 L.Ed.2d 354 (1960); see Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea Co., 381 U.S. 676, 686 , 85 S.Ct. 1596 , 14 L.Ed.2d 640 (1965) (“the doctrine of primary jurisdiction is not a doctrine of futility”); Skaw v. United States, 740 F.2d 932, 938 (Fed.Cir.1984).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Francis Skaw v. United States
Fed. Cir. · 1984 · confidence medium
Co. v. Airport Transport Ass’n, et al., 253 F.2d 877, 886 (D.C.Cir.1958).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1981 · confidence medium
Ass’n, 253 F.2d 877, 885-86 (D.C.Cir.1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 930 , 80 S.Ct. 372 , 4 L.Ed.2d 354 (1960).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D. C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor
D.C. Cir. · 1973 · confidence medium
Ass’n, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 363-364 , 253 F.2d 877, 885-886 (1958); Capital Transit Co. v. Safeway Trails, Inc., 92 U.S.App.D.C. 20, 23 , 201 F.2d 708, 711 (1953). .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Bethlehem Steel Corporation, and Bethlehem Steel Company v. Grace Line, Inc.
D.C. Cir. · 1969 · confidence medium
Ass’n, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 363-364 , 253 F.2d 877, 885-886 (1958); Capital Transit Co. v. Safeway Trails, Inc., 92 U.S.App.D.C. 20, 23 , 201 F.2d 708, 711 (1953). 60 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Marnell v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 1966 · confidence medium
D.C. 355, 253 F.2d 877, 887 (1958); Slick Airways v. American Airlines, 107 F.Supp. 199 (D.N.J.1952).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Movers' & Warehousemen's Ass'n of America v. United States
D.D.C. · 1964 · confidence medium
D.C. 355, 363-364, 253 F.2d 877, 885-886 (1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 930 , 80 S.Ct. 372 , 4 L.Ed.2d 354 (1959); and see generally, Riss & Co. v. Association of American Railroads, 170 F.Supp. 354 (D.C.1959); Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Riss & Company, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 380 , 267 F.2d 657 (1958). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leonard Dixon
v.
United States
14092.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
May 2, 1958.
253 F.2d 877
Published

253 F.2d 877

102 U.S.App.D.C. 355

Leonard DIXON, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 14092.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 3, 1958.
Decided March 13, 1958, Petition for Rehearing In Banc
Denied May 2, 1958.

Appeal from the United States District Court from the District of Columbia, Bolitha J. Laws, Judge.

Mr. Raymond C. Kates, Washington, D.C. (appointed by the District Court) for appellant.

Mr. John W. Warner, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., for appellee. Messrs, Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Lewis Carroll andHarold H. Titus, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief for appellee. Mr. Harry T. Alexander, Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and FAHY and BURGER, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

[*~877]1

This appeal is from a conviction for sale of narcotics. Though court-appointed counsel has diligently presented all matters he deems pertinent to the appeal, we find no error.

[*~878]2

Affirmed.

[*~887]3

BURGER, Circuit Judge, would dismiss the appeal.