Harold Roberts v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., 260 F.2d 958 (9th Cir. 1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Harold Roberts v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., 260 F.2d 958 (9th Cir. 1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harold ROBERTS Et Al., Appellants,
v.
FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee
16002.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Nov 19, 1958.
260 F.2d 958
Kimball & Clark, Ned W. Kimball, Waterville, Wash., for appellants., Dale M. Green, U. S. Atty., Robert L. Fraser, Asst. U. S. Atty., Spokane, Wash., for appellee.
Barnes, Hamley, Goodman.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee upon the ground that the record showed that appellants had failed to comply with the conditions precedent of crop insurance issued to them by appellee. The issue presented on the motion below and again on appeal here was whether or not the appel-lee had lawfully waived or was estopped to require compliance by appellants with the conditions precedent of the insurance contract.

Judge Sam Driver justly and properly disposed of the cause and we adopt his reasons as ours for affirming the judgment.

Affirmed on opinion below, Roberts v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, D.C.E.D.Wash.1958, 158 F.Supp. 688.