Richard M. James v. United States, 269 F.2d 245 (D.C. Cir. 1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Richard M. James v. United States, 269 F.2d 245 (D.C. Cir. 1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Getty Images News Services, Corp. v. Department of Defense (dcd, 2002-03-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Getty Images News Services, Corp. v. Department of Defense
D.D.C. · 2002 · confidence medium
See Nation Magazine, 762 F.Supp. at 1575 (government must act in a non-discriminatory manner in regulating access to battlefield; in the context of a military operation, DOD may place “reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on the press upon showing that there is a significant governmental interest”); see also Sherrill, 569 F.2d at 130 (individual newsmen may not be arbitrarily denied access to White House press facilities); Frank v. Herter, 269 F.2d 245, 247-48 (D.C.Cir.1959) (Burger, J., concurring) (government’s selection of correspondents to travel to China may not be discri…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Zemel v. Rusk (2×)
D. Conn. · 1964 · confidence medium
The distinction made between news agencies with a demonstrated interest in foreign news coverage and individual reporters must have some relevance to the purpose to be achieved. *•»«** -» “The foreign policy considerations give the Secretary wide latitude in drawing a line and defining criteria.” Frank v. Herter, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 54 , 269 F.2d 245, 247-248 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert Sherrill v. H. Stuart Knight, Director, United States Secret Service
D.C. Cir. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Frank v. Herter, 106 U.S. App.D.C. 54, 269 F.2d 245 (Secretary of State’s manner of selecting correspondents allowed to travel to China is subject to judicial review), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 918 , 80 S.Ct. 256 , 4 L.Ed.2d 187 (1959). 15 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard M. James
v.
United States
14847_1.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jul 2, 1959.
269 F.2d 245
Published

269 F.2d 245

Richard M. JAMES, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 14847.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued June 26, 1959.

Decided July 2, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Joseph J. Sirica, District Judge.

Mr. Richard A. Mehler, Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court) for appellant.

Mr. Walter J. Bonner, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

[*~245]1

This appeal is from a conviction of robbery. We find no error.

[*~248]2

Affirmed.