MacNeil Bros. Co. v. Fox, Orlov & Cowin, a P'ship, 285 F.2d 277 (D.C. Cir. 1960). · Go Syfert
MacNeil Bros. Co. v. Fox, Orlov & Cowin, a P'ship, 285 F.2d 277 (D.C. Cir. 1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MacNeil Bros. Company
v.
Fox, Orlov & Cowin, a Partnership
14979_1.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Nov 23, 1960.
285 F.2d 277
Published

285 F.2d 277

MacNEIL BROS. COMPANY et al., Appellants,
v.
FOX, ORLOV & COWIN, a partnership, Appellee.

No. 14979.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 1960.

Decided November 23, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Edward A. Tamin, Judge.

No counsel appeared to argue for appellants. At the direction of court, the case for appellants was treated as submitted on appellants' brief.

Phillip Cowin, of the bar of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Boston, Mass., pro hac vice, by special leave of court, submitted on the brief for appellee. Melville W. Feldman, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellee.

Before PRETTYMAN, DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

[*~277]1

Substantially, this is an appeal from an order of the District Court granting motion to quash service of summons. The record is clear that the District Court was correct in its action.

[*~278]2

Accordingly, the order of the District Court is

[*~279]3

Affirmed.