Sarah Danzig & Robert L. Danzig v. Virgin Isle Hotel, Inc., 286 F.2d 960 (3rd Cir. 1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Sarah Danzig & Robert L. Danzig v. Virgin Isle Hotel, Inc., 286 F.2d 960 (3rd Cir. 1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Central Motorplex, Inc. v. Comm'r (tax, 2013-12-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Central Motorplex, Inc. v. Comm'r
Tax Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Field v. Commissioner , 32 T.C. 187 , 204 (1959) , *302 aff'd without published opinion , 286 F.2d 960 (6th Cir. 1960) ; Asbury v. Commissioner , T.C.
cited Cited "see" Asbury v. Comm'r
Tax Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Field v. Commissioner , 32 T.C. 187 , 204 (1959) , affd. without published opinion 286 F.2d 960 (6th Cir. 1960) ; Bos Lines, Inc. v. Commissioner , T.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sarah DANZIG and Robert L. Danzig
v.
VIRGIN ISLE HOTEL, INC., Appellant
13252.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Mar 22, 1961.
286 F.2d 960
William W. Bailey, Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, for appellant., Joseph G. Blum, New York City, for appellee.
Goodrich, McLaughlin, Kalodner.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action brought to recover for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered from a fall in defendant’s hotel. The parties are not in dispute about the principle of law which governs such a case and each agrees with the general statement of the obligation of the proprietor of premises to a business guest found in the Restatement of Torts. The disputed point is whether there was sufficient evidence of violation of the duty of care to justify a jury verdict for the plaintiff. It is not a very strong case but we think there is enough to justify its submission to a jury. It was so submitted and the jury decided for the plaintiff.

The judgment will be affirmed.