green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
American Home Assurance Co. v. Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg
See Elston-Richards Storage Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America, 194 F.Supp. 673, 678-82 (W.D.Mich.1960), aff'd, 291 F.2d 627 (6th Cir.1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Michigan Chemical Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.
See Elston-Richards Storage Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America, 194 F.Supp. 673, 678-82 (W.D.Mich. 1960), aff’d., 291 F.2d 627 (6th Cir.1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Michigan Chemical Corporation, and American Mutual Reinsurance Company, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. American Home Assurance Company, Principal and Third-Party (82-1438) and Insurance Company of North America, (82-1439) Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, (82-1440) v. Midland Insurance Company, Third-Party
See Elston-Richards Storage Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America, 194 F.Supp. 673, 678-82 (W.D.Mich.1960), aff'd., 291 F.2d 627 (6th Cir.1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Calvin WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Thomas BELL, Substituted for Don Carmichael, Sheriff of Genesee County, Michigan, Deceased, Respondent-Appellee
v.
Thomas BELL, Substituted for Don Carmichael, Sheriff of Genesee County, Michigan, Deceased, Respondent-Appellee
14432.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jun 14, 1961.
Max Dean, Flint, Mich., Leitson, Dean, Dean & Abram, Flint, Mich., on brief, for petitioner-appellant., Robert F. Leonard, Asst. Pros. Atty., Flint, Mich., for respondent-appellee.
Miller, Martin, McAllister.
Published
ORDER.
The above cause coming on to be heard on the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,
Now therefore it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court denying appellant’s petition for habeas corpus, be and is hereby affirmed on the authority of Sweeney v. Woodall, 344 U.S. 86, 73 S.Ct. 139, 97 L.Ed. 114, and Johnson v. Matthews, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 376, 182 F.2d 677.