Muse v. Mellin, 339 F.2d 888 (2d Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Muse v. Mellin, 339 F.2d 888 (2d Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lennon v. McClory (dcd, 1998-03-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Lennon v. McClory
D.D.C. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Muse v. Mellin, 212 F.Supp. 315, 318 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, *1464 339 F.2d 888 (2d Cir.1964) (“This is simply a declaratory judgment action between one [copyright] assignee against another assignee of the same one-third interest to determine the [copyright] ownership of the elusive one-third.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Elan Associates, Ltd. v. Quackenbush Music, Ltd.
S.D.N.Y. · 1972 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Muse v. Mellin, 212 F.Supp. 315 (S.D.N.Y.1962), aff’d, 339 F.2d 888 (2d Cir. 1964); Cresci v. Music Publishers Holding Corp., 210 F.Supp. 253 (S.D.N.Y.1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clarence Muse and Mills Music, Inc.
v.
Robert Mellin, Robert Music Corporation, Sherwin Music, Inc. And American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers
28156.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Dec 29, 1964.
339 F.2d 888
Published

339 F.2d 888

Clarence MUSE and Mills Music, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Robert MELLIN, Robert Music Corporation, Sherwin Music, Inc. and American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 214.

Docket 28156.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued November 17, 1964.

Decided December 29, 1964.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Richard H. Levet, J., dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Opinion below reported at 212 F.Supp. 315.

Theodore R. Kupferman, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jack M. Ginsberg, New York City, for defendants-appellees.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment below is affirmed on the authority of T. B. Harms Co. v. Eliscu, 2 Cir., 339 F.2d 823, decided December 23, 1964.

2

Affirmed.