John J. Meehan, Adm'r of the Est. of Donald H. Worrell, Deceased v. Gulf Oil Corp.. William J. Kernan, Adm'r of the Est. of Arthur E. Milan, Deceased v. Gulf Oil Corp., 341 F.2d 920 (3rd Cir. 1965). · Go Syfert
Search
John J. Meehan, Adm'r of the Est. of Donald H. Worrell, Deceased v. Gulf Oil Corp.. William J. Kernan, Adm'r of the Est. of Arthur E. Milan, Deceased v. Gulf Oil Corp., 341 F.2d 920 (3rd Cir. 1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bailey v. United States (njd, 1976-06-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Bailey v. United States
D.N.J. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Quinn v. Hook, 231 F.Supp. 718 (E.D.Pa.1964), aff'd, 341 F.2d 920 (3d Cir. 1965). 17 .
discussed Cited "see" Milton Berger and Ruth K. Berger (Deceased) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Pennsylvania Papyrus Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph Yovanovich and Ann Yovanovich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
3rd Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Quinn v. Hook, 231 F.Supp. 718 (E.D.Pa.1964), aff'd per curiam, 341 F.2d 920 (3 Cir. 1965), describing the framework for review of tax claims 19 Brown v. Lethert, 360 F.2d 560, 562 (8 Cir. 1966); Cohen v. United States, 297 F.2d 760, 772 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 865 , 82 S.Ct. 1029 , 8 L.Ed.2d 84 (1962).
cited Cited "see" Berger v. Commissioner
3rd Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Quinn v. Hook, 231 F.Supp. 718 (E.D.Pa.1964), aff’d per curiam, 341 F.2d 920 (3 Cir. 1965), describing the framework for review of tax claims. .
cited Cited "see" Schmitz v. Societe Internationale
D.D.C. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Quinn v. Hook, 231 F.Supp. 718 (E.D.Pa.1964), aff’d, 341 F.2d 920 (3 Cir. 1965).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Middlesex Savings Bank v. Johnson
D. Mass. · 1991 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e.g., Quinn v. Hook, 231 F.Supp. 718, 721 (E.D.Pa.1964) (district court opinion in Pipola has survived as the correct interpretation of § 2410), aff’d, 341 F.2d 920 (3d Cir.1965) and Cooper Agency, Inc. v. McLeod, 235 F.Supp. 276, 284 (E.D.S.C.1964) (O’Connor court did not intend to overrule holding in Pipola that non-taxpayer could not commence action under § 2410 and inquire into merits of assessment), aff’d, 348 F.2d 919 (4th Cir.1965), with Sonitz v. United States, 221 F.Supp. 762 (D.N.J.1963) (plaintiff in § 2410 action may challenge merits of tax assessment) and Falik v…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Seff v. Machiz
D. Maryland · 1965 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Quinn v. Hook, E.D.Pa., 231 F.Supp. 718 , aff’d 3 Cir., 341 F.2d 920 (1965); Falik v. United States, 2 Cir., 343 F.2d 38 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John J. Meehan, Administrator of the Estate of Donald H. Worrell, Deceased
v.
Gulf Oil Corporation. William J. Kernan, Administrator of the Estate of Arthur E. Milan, Deceased v. Gulf Oil Corporation
15022_1.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Mar 5, 1965.
341 F.2d 920
Published

341 F.2d 920

John J. MEEHAN, Administrator of the Estate of Donald H. Worrell, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
GULF OIL CORPORATION.
William J. KERNAN, Administrator of the Estate of Arthur E. Milan, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
GULF OIL CORPORATION.

No. 15021.

No. 15022.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued February 12, 1965.

Decided March 5, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; C. William Kraft, Jr., Judge.

Milton M. Borowsky and Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa. (Abraham E. Freedman and Freedman, Landy & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

John B. Hannum and Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

On review of the record we find no error.

2

The judgments in favor of defendant and against plaintiff at appeal Nos. 15021 and 15022, entered by Judge Kraft on October 7, 1963, pursuant to the jury's verdicts, will be affirmed, D. C., 231 F. Supp. 339, on remand from 3 Civ., 312 F.2d 737, which reversed D.C., 201 F. Supp. 117.