William McFarland v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, California, 376 F.2d 852 (9th Cir. 1967). · Go Syfert
William McFarland v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, California, 376 F.2d 852 (9th Cir. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Earline Whisenant, Individually and as Tutrix of Her Minor Children, Sheila Dianne Whisenant v. Brewster-Bartle Offshore Company v. Loomis Hydraulic Testing Co., Inc., Third Party (ca3, 1971-09-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Earline Whisenant, Individually and as Tutrix of Her Minor Children, Sheila Dianne Whisenant v. Brewster-Bartle Offshore Company v. Loomis Hydraulic Testing Co., Inc., Third Party
3rd Cir. · 1971 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Underwater Services, Inc. v. Brown & Root Marine Operators, 376 F.2d 852 5th Cir. 1967), aff'g Smith v. Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc., 243 F.Supp. 130 (W.D.La.1965); Strachan Shipping Co. v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche S.M., N.V., 324 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied 376 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 969 , 11 L.Ed.2d 972 ; Damanti v. A/S Inger, 314 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, Daniels & Kennedy Inc. v. A/S Inger, 375 U.S. 834 , 84 S.Ct. 46 , 11 L.Ed.2d 64 ; Rederi A/B Dalen v. Maher, 303 F.2d 565 (4th Cir. 1962); Johnson v. Excelsior Shipping Co., 319 F.Supp. 986, 989 (S.D.…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Whisenant v. Brewster-Bartle Offshore Co.
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Underwater Services, Inc. v. Brown & Root Marine Operators, 376 F.2d 852 5th Cir. 1967), aff’g Smith v. Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc., 243 F.Supp. 130 (W.D.La.1965); Strachan Shipping Co. v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche S.M., N.V., 324 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied 376 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 969 , 11 L.Ed.2d 972 ; Damanti v. A/S Inger, 314 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, Daniels & Kennedy Inc. v. A/S Inger, 375 U.S. 834 , 84 S.Ct. 46 , 11 L.Ed.2d 64 ; Rederi A/B Dalen v. Maher, 303 F.2d 565 (4th Cir. 1962); Johnson v. Excelsior Shipping Co., 319 F.Supp. 986, 989 (S…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William McFARLAND, Appellant,
v.
Lawrence E. WILSON, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, California, Appellee
21085_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 17, 1967.
376 F.2d 852
Arthur Berggren, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Thomas Lynch, Atty. Gen., Robert R. Granucci, Joyce F. Nedde, Deputy Attys., Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Madden, Claims, Hamley, Browning.
Published
PER CURIAM:

William McFarland, in California penal custody under a life sentence, following his 1958 trial and conviction for murder, robbery and attempted robbery, applied to the district court for a writ of habeas corpus. He contended that, over his objection, incriminating statements which he had involuntarily given to investigating public officers, were used in evidence against him at his state trial, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The district court, after an evidentiary hearing, found and concluded that the totality of the circumstances surrounding the giving of the incriminating statements does not indicate that they were involuntary and therefore inadmissible. The district court therefore denied the application for a writ of ha-beas corpus.

On this appeal, McFarland questions the findings and conclusions which led the district court to deny the application. For the reasons stated in the comprehensive opinion of the district court, McFarland v. Wilson, N.D.Cal., 266 F.Supp. 576, we

Affirm.