United States v. Robert Lee Davis, 390 F.2d 879 (2d Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
United States v. Robert Lee Davis, 390 F.2d 879 (2d Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
74 citation events across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Joachim Hagopian v. Major General William Knowlton (ca2, 1972-10-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Joachim Hagopian v. Major General William Knowlton
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Winters v. United States, 281 F.Supp. 289 (E.D.N.Y.), affd., 390 F.2d 879 (2d Cir. 1068); Fox v. Brown, 402 F.2d 837 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1114 , 89 S.Ct. 1007 , 22 L.Ed.2d 120 (1969).
discussed Cited "see" Mellinger v. Laird (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
E.D. Pa. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Winters v. United States, 281 F.Supp. 289 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d per curiam, 390 F.2d 879 (2nd Cir. 1969); Weber v. United States, 288 F.Supp. 491 (E.D.Pa.1968).
cited Cited "see" United States v. McDonald
N.D. Ill. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Davis, 279 F.Supp. 920, 924 (D.Conn. 1967), aff’d 390 F.2d 879 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 869 , 89 S.Ct. 155 , 21 L.Ed.2d 137 (1968).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Commanding Officer, Armed Forces
1st Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See De-Rozario v. Commanding Officer, 390 F.2d 532, 535-536 (9 Cir. 1968), and authorities there cited. 7 Whether or not habeas corpus is available, the district court was free to treat the petition as one for mandamus under 28 U.S.C. 1361, which vests the district court with 'original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.' Schonbrun makes no claim that the Army has not acted 'within its jurisdiction under valid law,' see Winters v. United States, 281 F.Supp. 289,…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Bornemann
D. Conn. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Davis, 279 F.Supp. 920 (D.Conn.1967), aff’d, 390 F.2d 879 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 869 , 89 S.Ct. 155 , 21 L.Ed.2d 137 (1968).
discussed Cited "see" Fox v. Brown
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Winters v. United States, 281 F.Supp. 289, 296 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d 390 F.2d 879 (2d Cir. 1968); see also Morse v. Boswell, 289 F.Supp. 812 (D.Md.1968) and Pfile v. Corcoran, 287 F.Supp. 554 (D.Colo. 1968).
cited Cited "see" Even v. Clifford
S.D. Cal. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Winters v. United States, 281 F.Supp. 289 (E.D.N.Y., 1968), affirmed 390 F.2d 879 (2nd Cir., 1968) (Per Curiam).
discussed Cited "see" Fox v. Brown (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
S.D.N.Y. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Winters v. United States, 281 F.Supp. 289 (E.D.N.Y.) aff’d 390 F.2d 879 (2 Cir. 1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Robert Lee Davis
31400_1.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Mar 6, 1968.
390 F.2d 879
Published

390 F.2d 879

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Robert Lee DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 247, Docket 31400.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 22, 1968.
Decided March 6, 1968.

John Cassidento, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Haven, Conn. (Jon O. Newman, U.S. Atty. for District of Connecticut, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for appellee.

Ira B. Grudberg, New Haven, Conn. (Jacobs, Jacobs, Grudberg & Clifford, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Before MEDINA, MOORE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We affirm on the opinion of Judge Zampano below, 279 F.Supp. 920 (D.Conn.1967). We merely add that United States v. Stepler, 258 F.2d 310 (3rd Cir. 1958), which is relied upon by appellant, is distinguishable principally because it involved unlawful action on the part of a Draft Board in classifying a registrant.

2

Affirmed.