Mabel Whayne v. M. v. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., & Transp. Mgmt. Serv., Inc, 397 F.2d 287 (3rd Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Mabel Whayne v. M. v. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., & Transp. Mgmt. Serv., Inc, 397 F.2d 287 (3rd Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Emile A. Williams v. McAllister Brothers Inc. (ca2, 1976-04-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Emile A. Williams v. McAllister Brothers Inc.
2d Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Whayne v. Transportation Management Service, Inc., 252 F.Supp. 573, 577 (E.D.Pa.1966), aff’d, 397 F.2d 287 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 978 , 89 S.Ct. 445 , 21 L.Ed.2d 438 (1968); 1 W.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mohammad El-Mezain (2×)
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Roberts v. City of Shreveport, 397 F.2d 287 , 295 (5th Cir. 2005) (newspaper articles are “classic inadmissible hearsay”); see FED.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mohammad El-Mezain (2×)
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Roberts v. City of Shreveport, 397 F.2d 287 , 295 (5th Cir. 2005) (newspaper articles are “classic inadmissible hearsay”); see FED.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Shukri Abu Baker (2×)
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Roberts v. City of Shreveport, 397 F.2d 287 , 295 (5th Cir. 2005) (newspaper articles are “classic inadmissible hearsay”); see FED.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mohammad El-Mezain (2×)
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Roberts v. City of Shreveport, 397 F.2d 287 , 295 (5th Cir. 2005) (newspaper articles are “classic inadmissible hearsay”); see FED.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Holy Land Fdn for Relief (2×)
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Roberts v. City of Shreveport, 397 F.2d 287 , 295 (5th Cir. 2005) (newspaper articles are “classic inadmissible hearsay”); see FED.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Shukri Baker (2×)
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Roberts v. City of Shreveport, 397 F.2d 287 , 295 (5th Cir. 2005) (newspaper articles are “classic inadmissible hearsay”); see FED.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Holy Land Fdn for Relief (2×)
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Roberts v. City of Shreveport, 397 F.2d 287 , 295 (5th Cir. 2005) (newspaper articles are “classic inadmissible hearsay”); see FED.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mohammad El-Mezain (2×)
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Roberts v. City of Shreveport, 397 F.2d 287 , 295 (5th Cir. 2005) (newspaper articles are “classic inadmissible hearsay”); see FED.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Shukri Abu Baker (2×)
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Roberts v. City of Shreveport, 397 F.2d 287 , 295 (5th Cir. 2005) (newspaper articles are “classic inadmissible hearsay”); see FED.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mohammad El-Mezain (2×)
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Roberts v. City of Shreveport, 397 F.2d 287 , 295 (5th Cir. 2005) (newspaper articles are “classic inadmissible hearsay”); see FED.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Berkowitz v. Allied Stores of Penn-Ohio, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Whayne v. Transportation Management Service, 252 F.Supp. 573 (1966) aff’d 397 F.2d 287 (3rd Cir. 1968), cert. den., 393 U.S. 978 , 89 S.Ct. 445 , 21 L.Ed.2d 438 . *1215 The Court perceives little substantive difference in the tests heretofore discussed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mabel Whayne
v.
M. v. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation Management Service, Inc
15921.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Dec 9, 1968.
397 F.2d 287
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

397 F.2d 287

Mabel WHAYNE, Appellant,
v.
M. V. SHUTTLER, INC., Lea River Lines, Inc., and
Transportation Management Service, Inc.

Nos. 15920, 15921.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 15, 1967, Reargued May 20, 1968.
Decided June 19, 1968, Certiorari Denied Dec. 9, 1968, See
89 S.Ct. 445.

Avram G. Adler, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Joseph A. Barone, Krusen, Evans & Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa. (Robert Cox, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

[*~287]1

This appeal arises out of civil and admiralty actions brought by Mabel Whayne against M. V. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation Management Service, Inc. Plaintiff-libellant appeals from orders of the district court vacating service as to M. V. Shuttler, Inc., and Lea River Lines, Inc., and dismissing with prejudice the actions against Transportation Management Service, Inc.

[*~288]2

We have carefully reviewed the entire record in this matter and we can find no error. Accordingly, the orders of the district court will be affirmed.