Leuthold v. Camp, 405 F.2d 499 (1st Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Leuthold v. Camp, 405 F.2d 499 (1st Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Marshall & Ilsley Corporation v. John G. Heimann, Comptroller of the Currency of the United States (ca7, 1981-06-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Marshall & Ilsley Corporation v. John G. Heimann, Comptroller of the Currency of the United States
7th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Leuthold v. Camp, 273 F.Supp. 695, 702 (D.Mont.1967), aff’d, 405 F.2d 499 (9th Cir. 1969); South Dakota v. Nat’l Bank of South Dakota, 335 F.2d 444 , 448 — 19 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 970 , 85 S.Ct. 667 , 13 L.Ed.2d 562 (1965) (“The words in the statute ‘other than a bank’ clearly show the intention of Congress not to require a bank acquiring the assets of another bank to obtain Board approval”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Albert E. Leuthold, Superintendent of Banks, State of Montana, Helena, Montana, Security Bank, and Miners Bank of Montana, N. A.
v.
William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency, the First National Bank of Butte and Daly National Bank of Anaconda, Appellee-Intervenors
22202.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Jan 21, 1969.
405 F.2d 499
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

405 F.2d 499

Albert E. LEUTHOLD, Superintendent of Banks, State of Montana, Helena, Montana, Security Bank, and Miners Bank of Montana, N. A., Appellants,
v.
William B. CAMP, Comptroller of the Currency, Appellee,
The First National Bank of Butte and Daly National Bank of Anaconda, Appellee-Intervenors.

No. 22202.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

January 21, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana; Russell E. Smith, Judge.

1

John M. Schiltz (argued), of Hutton, Schiltz & Sheehy, Billings, Mont., Donald A. Garrity, Asst. Atty. Gen., Helena, Mont., Weber, Bosch & Kuhr, Havre, Mont., for appellant.

2

Alan S. Rosenthal, Washington, D. C. (argued), Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Stephen R. Felson, Washington, D. C., Moody Brickett, U. S. Atty., Butte, Mont., for appellee.

3

John D. French (argued), of Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, Minn., McKeon & Brolin, Anaconda, Mont., Johnson & Johnson, Butte, Mont., for intervenors.

4

Horace R. Hansen, of Hansen, Hazen, Dordell & Bradt, St. Paul, Minn., amicus curiae.

5

Reavis, Pogue, Neal & Rose, Washington, D. C., amicus curiæ.

6

Before HAMLEY and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and FOLEY, District Judge[*].

PER CURIAM:

7

On August 28, 1967, Judge Russell E. Smith, of the District of Montana, filed his Opinion and Order in Leuthold et al. v. Camp, 273 F.Supp. 695.

8

On the basis of the Opinion and Order of the District Judge and the case of Neusse v. Camp, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 172, 385 F.2d 694, decided October 4, 1967,[1] the judgment is affirmed.

Notes:

*

Honorable Roger D. Foley, District of Nevada, sitting by designation

1

On the question of the State Superintendent of Bank's standing to sue, we note and approve the following language from Nuesse v. Camp. At page 700 of 385 F.2d, the Court stated:

"We should not be nigardly in guaging the interest of a state administrative officer in the validity of what his federal counterpart has done in an area of overlapping fact and intertwined law. We not only have the greater impetus to intervention that inheres in administrative cases, but in addition the `interest' of the state commissioner is underlined by the circumstance that the regulation of national banking is an area in which Congress, in the exercise of delegated federal power, has for various policy reasons decided to adopt and incorporate state law on issues of common concern. This admixture of national and state policies, attaching national legal force to the state policy, yields the corollary that a state official directly concerned in effectuating the state policy has an `interest' in a legal controversy involving the Comptroller which concerns the nature and protection of the state policy."